Re: [EXTERNAL] Additional session WG1 and WG6
by Cridge, Tom
Hi Yulia,
Great, in that case I take it you are happy with that proposed session.
In the case of 386 and 407 you will have to contact Nestor to clone the abstracts so you can merge them and accept the new one in WG6. Similarly, for talks 62, 344, 361, 386 which will have to be converted from posters to talks. However, I have just been contacted by the author of 62 who can no longer attend due to funding issues. Therefore I would suggest to replace it with talk 331 (given we in WG1 have not been assigned any additional talks we would very much appreciate this to give us an extra space). In that case the final list would be
344, 361, 386+407 (407 from WG6 only), 67 (from WG1 only), 331 (from WG1 only) + 415 (from WG6 only).
If you are happy with that please go ahead and organise this session (we will have our own WG1 session to organise simultaneous with this one as Nestor mentioned).
Thanks again,
Tom
________________________________
From: Yulia Furletova <yulia(a)jlab.org>
Sent: 01 April 2022 12:23
To: Cridge, Tom <t.cridge(a)ucl.ac.uk>; dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es>
Cc: dis2022_wg6(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg6(a)igfae.usc.es>
Subject: Re: [DIS2022_wg1] Re: [EXTERNAL] Additional session WG1 and WG6
Hi Cridge,
I see that 386 is already acceped by WG1, and 407 is already accepted by WG6. So, at this stage it will be impossible to merge via indico. I talked to Anselm, he agrred on this merge , but at this moment it is unclear who will give a talk. Maybe you could discuss again with both of them ( with both speakers).
We will add #415 to this session.
Best, Yulia
On April 1, 2022 6:09:18 AM "Cridge, Tom" <t.cridge(a)ucl.ac.uk> wrote:
Dear WG6,
Any response to this? Sorry to rush but we are receiving questions from some of these participants, so we wish to resolve this very quickly.
Many thanks,
Tom for WG1
________________________________
From: Cridge, Tom <t.cridge(a)ucl.ac.uk>
Sent: 30 March 2022 21:27
To: Yulia Furletova <yulia(a)jlab.org>; dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es>
Cc: dis2022_wg6(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg6(a)igfae.usc.es>
Subject: Re: [DIS2022_wg1] Re: [EXTERNAL] Additional session WG1 and WG6
Dear Yulia and WG6 conveners,
Thanks for getting back to us, given a session cannot really be longer than 6 talks in length, we would propose that we take the 4 talks we agree upon that were jointly submitted to our WGs - i.e. 62, 344, 361, 386 (and we are fine for you to merge 407 with this), that leaves two further talks, As we both have lots of talks to consider a fair way to do it then seems for us each to have one talk submitted to our individual WG included here, making up the 6 talks. Please let us know if you agree that this seems a reasonable way to divide this.
In that case we would put talk 67 that we mentioned in here and deal with our talk 331 in our own sessions, please let us know which of your talks (or a merger of two of your talks into one) you would then include.
Thanks again and best regards,
Tom (for WG1 conveners - Tom, Klaus, Barak)
________________________________
From: Yulia Furletova <yulia(a)jlab.org>
Sent: 30 March 2022 17:12
To: dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es>
Cc: dis2022_wg6(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg6(a)igfae.usc.es>
Subject: [DIS2022_wg1] Re: [EXTERNAL] Additional session WG1 and WG6
⚠ Caution: External sender
Hi Klaus, all,
We are proposing to keep 407 ( and merge 386 into 407) - we do not have space for both !
62, 344, 361 are fine to us. We propose to add here 407 ( merged with 386)
It would be good if we could squeeze there couple of more talks from WG6- at the moment we are at the overflow.
for example ,
415 - CORE - a Compact Detector for the Electron-Ion Collider
0r 298 - ATHENA – A new detector proposed at the Electron-Ion Collider
84 - The impact of energy frontier DIS measurements on future hadron collider physics (HL-LHC and FCC-hh)
Your thoughts ?
Best, Yulia
It
On Mar 30, 2022, at 9:33 AM, Klaus Rabbertz <klaus.rabbertz(a)cern.ch<mailto:klaus.rabbertz@cern.ch>> wrote:
Dear WG6 conveners,
have you come to a conclusion concerning our proposal?
I fear we have to conclude on this rather quickly now.
Thank you and best regards,
Klaus (for WG1 conveners - Tom, Klaus, Barak)
Cridge, Tom wrote:
Dear WG6 conveners,
Following Nestor's hard work to obtain an additional room and confirmation we can accept a few additional talks for joint sessions earlier today, we are emailing to return to your idea of a joint session between WG1 and WG6 on future experiments. We would propose to include the following talks in this session (some of which we currently only had room for as posters):
62, 344, 361, 386 and also 331("Studying nuclear matter with jets in the sPHENIX experiment at RHIC") and 67 ("Probing free nucleons with (anti)neutrinos") , the first four were all jointly submitted to our WGs originally whilst the latter two were submitted to WG1 on this topic, therefore I include the titles for those two.
Please let us know if this would work for you and if so/not your comments on this. I would also note that currently in WG1 we are occupying one room for the whole of the timetabled parallel sessions, therefore this additional joint session would be parallel to one of our sessions and in addition to WG6's current sessions I believe. We would organise our timetable to ensure the overlapping topics were not of mutual interest.
Many thanks,
Tom (for WG1 conveners - Tom, Klaus, Barak)
_______________________________________________
DIS2022_wg1 mailing list -- dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es<mailto:dis2022_wg1@igfae.usc.es>
To unsubscribe send an email to dis2022_wg1-leave(a)igfae.usc.es<mailto:dis2022_wg1-leave@igfae.usc.es>
2 years, 6 months
Re: [EXTERNAL] Additional session WG1 and WG6
by Yulia Furletova
Hi Cridge,
I see that 386 is already acceped by WG1, and 407 is already accepted by WG6. So, at this stage it will be impossible to merge via indico. I talked to Anselm, he agrred on this merge , but at this moment it is unclear who will give a talk. Maybe you could discuss again with both of them ( with both speakers).
We will add #415 to this session.
Best, Yulia
On April 1, 2022 6:09:18 AM "Cridge, Tom" <t.cridge(a)ucl.ac.uk> wrote:
Dear WG6,
Any response to this? Sorry to rush but we are receiving questions from some of these participants, so we wish to resolve this very quickly.
Many thanks,
Tom for WG1
________________________________
From: Cridge, Tom <t.cridge(a)ucl.ac.uk>
Sent: 30 March 2022 21:27
To: Yulia Furletova <yulia(a)jlab.org>; dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es>
Cc: dis2022_wg6(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg6(a)igfae.usc.es>
Subject: Re: [DIS2022_wg1] Re: [EXTERNAL] Additional session WG1 and WG6
Dear Yulia and WG6 conveners,
Thanks for getting back to us, given a session cannot really be longer than 6 talks in length, we would propose that we take the 4 talks we agree upon that were jointly submitted to our WGs - i.e. 62, 344, 361, 386 (and we are fine for you to merge 407 with this), that leaves two further talks, As we both have lots of talks to consider a fair way to do it then seems for us each to have one talk submitted to our individual WG included here, making up the 6 talks. Please let us know if you agree that this seems a reasonable way to divide this.
In that case we would put talk 67 that we mentioned in here and deal with our talk 331 in our own sessions, please let us know which of your talks (or a merger of two of your talks into one) you would then include.
Thanks again and best regards,
Tom (for WG1 conveners - Tom, Klaus, Barak)
________________________________
From: Yulia Furletova <yulia(a)jlab.org>
Sent: 30 March 2022 17:12
To: dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es>
Cc: dis2022_wg6(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg6(a)igfae.usc.es>
Subject: [DIS2022_wg1] Re: [EXTERNAL] Additional session WG1 and WG6
⚠ Caution: External sender
Hi Klaus, all,
We are proposing to keep 407 ( and merge 386 into 407) - we do not have space for both !
62, 344, 361 are fine to us. We propose to add here 407 ( merged with 386)
It would be good if we could squeeze there couple of more talks from WG6- at the moment we are at the overflow.
for example ,
415 - CORE - a Compact Detector for the Electron-Ion Collider
0r 298 - ATHENA – A new detector proposed at the Electron-Ion Collider
84 - The impact of energy frontier DIS measurements on future hadron collider physics (HL-LHC and FCC-hh)
Your thoughts ?
Best, Yulia
It
On Mar 30, 2022, at 9:33 AM, Klaus Rabbertz <klaus.rabbertz(a)cern.ch<mailto:klaus.rabbertz@cern.ch>> wrote:
Dear WG6 conveners,
have you come to a conclusion concerning our proposal?
I fear we have to conclude on this rather quickly now.
Thank you and best regards,
Klaus (for WG1 conveners - Tom, Klaus, Barak)
Cridge, Tom wrote:
Dear WG6 conveners,
Following Nestor's hard work to obtain an additional room and confirmation we can accept a few additional talks for joint sessions earlier today, we are emailing to return to your idea of a joint session between WG1 and WG6 on future experiments. We would propose to include the following talks in this session (some of which we currently only had room for as posters):
62, 344, 361, 386 and also 331("Studying nuclear matter with jets in the sPHENIX experiment at RHIC") and 67 ("Probing free nucleons with (anti)neutrinos") , the first four were all jointly submitted to our WGs originally whilst the latter two were submitted to WG1 on this topic, therefore I include the titles for those two.
Please let us know if this would work for you and if so/not your comments on this. I would also note that currently in WG1 we are occupying one room for the whole of the timetabled parallel sessions, therefore this additional joint session would be parallel to one of our sessions and in addition to WG6's current sessions I believe. We would organise our timetable to ensure the overlapping topics were not of mutual interest.
Many thanks,
Tom (for WG1 conveners - Tom, Klaus, Barak)
_______________________________________________
DIS2022_wg1 mailing list -- dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es<mailto:dis2022_wg1@igfae.usc.es>
To unsubscribe send an email to dis2022_wg1-leave(a)igfae.usc.es<mailto:dis2022_wg1-leave@igfae.usc.es>
2 years, 6 months
Re: [EXTERNAL] Additional session WG1 and WG6
by Cridge, Tom
Dear WG6,
Any response to this? Sorry to rush but we are receiving questions from some of these participants, so we wish to resolve this very quickly.
Many thanks,
Tom for WG1
________________________________
From: Cridge, Tom <t.cridge(a)ucl.ac.uk>
Sent: 30 March 2022 21:27
To: Yulia Furletova <yulia(a)jlab.org>; dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es>
Cc: dis2022_wg6(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg6(a)igfae.usc.es>
Subject: Re: [DIS2022_wg1] Re: [EXTERNAL] Additional session WG1 and WG6
Dear Yulia and WG6 conveners,
Thanks for getting back to us, given a session cannot really be longer than 6 talks in length, we would propose that we take the 4 talks we agree upon that were jointly submitted to our WGs - i.e. 62, 344, 361, 386 (and we are fine for you to merge 407 with this), that leaves two further talks, As we both have lots of talks to consider a fair way to do it then seems for us each to have one talk submitted to our individual WG included here, making up the 6 talks. Please let us know if you agree that this seems a reasonable way to divide this.
In that case we would put talk 67 that we mentioned in here and deal with our talk 331 in our own sessions, please let us know which of your talks (or a merger of two of your talks into one) you would then include.
Thanks again and best regards,
Tom (for WG1 conveners - Tom, Klaus, Barak)
________________________________
From: Yulia Furletova <yulia(a)jlab.org>
Sent: 30 March 2022 17:12
To: dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es>
Cc: dis2022_wg6(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg6(a)igfae.usc.es>
Subject: [DIS2022_wg1] Re: [EXTERNAL] Additional session WG1 and WG6
⚠ Caution: External sender
Hi Klaus, all,
We are proposing to keep 407 ( and merge 386 into 407) - we do not have space for both !
62, 344, 361 are fine to us. We propose to add here 407 ( merged with 386)
It would be good if we could squeeze there couple of more talks from WG6- at the moment we are at the overflow.
for example ,
415 - CORE - a Compact Detector for the Electron-Ion Collider
0r 298 - ATHENA – A new detector proposed at the Electron-Ion Collider
84 - The impact of energy frontier DIS measurements on future hadron collider physics (HL-LHC and FCC-hh)
Your thoughts ?
Best, Yulia
It
On Mar 30, 2022, at 9:33 AM, Klaus Rabbertz <klaus.rabbertz(a)cern.ch<mailto:klaus.rabbertz@cern.ch>> wrote:
Dear WG6 conveners,
have you come to a conclusion concerning our proposal?
I fear we have to conclude on this rather quickly now.
Thank you and best regards,
Klaus (for WG1 conveners - Tom, Klaus, Barak)
Cridge, Tom wrote:
Dear WG6 conveners,
Following Nestor's hard work to obtain an additional room and confirmation we can accept a few additional talks for joint sessions earlier today, we are emailing to return to your idea of a joint session between WG1 and WG6 on future experiments. We would propose to include the following talks in this session (some of which we currently only had room for as posters):
62, 344, 361, 386 and also 331("Studying nuclear matter with jets in the sPHENIX experiment at RHIC") and 67 ("Probing free nucleons with (anti)neutrinos") , the first four were all jointly submitted to our WGs originally whilst the latter two were submitted to WG1 on this topic, therefore I include the titles for those two.
Please let us know if this would work for you and if so/not your comments on this. I would also note that currently in WG1 we are occupying one room for the whole of the timetabled parallel sessions, therefore this additional joint session would be parallel to one of our sessions and in addition to WG6's current sessions I believe. We would organise our timetable to ensure the overlapping topics were not of mutual interest.
Many thanks,
Tom (for WG1 conveners - Tom, Klaus, Barak)
_______________________________________________
DIS2022_wg1 mailing list -- dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es<mailto:dis2022_wg1@igfae.usc.es>
To unsubscribe send an email to dis2022_wg1-leave(a)igfae.usc.es<mailto:dis2022_wg1-leave@igfae.usc.es>
2 years, 6 months
Re: [Indico] Abstract Acceptance notification (#62)
by Richard Ruiz
Hi Tom,
Thank you for the update. I appreciate the effort. I also understand that
this is not a promise. Sure, I can hold off for a few days. Though of
course, early is better since flights and accommodations are creeping up in
price.
Best for now,
Richard
On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 6:06 PM Cridge, Tom <t.cridge(a)ucl.ac.uk> wrote:
> Dear Richard,
>
> Sorry for the delay on getting back to you on this, I was waiting until I
> had something completely resolved to update you. In any case the current
> situation is as follows.
>
> We have managed to obtain space for an additional session joint with WG6
> (Future experiments), this is not yet 100% confirmed hence the delay on our
> side, but your talk would be one that would go in this session as it would
> fit naturally. Therefore, it is looking likely we will have space for your
> talk, but this is currently waiting on approval from WG6 and the
> organisers. Would it be possible therefore to delay for a few more days
> whilst this is sorted out? We are pushing on our side to resolve this
> urgently too in order to provide you and others with clarity. Apologies
> again for the delay and complications with abstract acceptance, many of
> these decisions are out of our control and/or waiting for others to respond
> to obtain the confirmation.
>
> Note the early registration deadline is now moved to 8th April so perhaps
> this helps. Please let us know your thoughts.
>
> Best,
>
> Tom
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Richard Ruiz <richard.physics(a)gmail.com>
> *Sent:* 30 March 2022 14:22
> *To:* Cridge, Tom <t.cridge(a)ucl.ac.uk>
> *Cc:* dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es>
> *Subject:* Re: [DIS2022_wg1] Re: [Indico] Abstract Acceptance
> notification (#62)
>
> Dear Tom,
>
> Greetings.
>
> Sorry to trouble you. I just wanted confirm that the status remains
> unchanged, i.e., that I remain on the short list for a talk. If that is the
> case, I respectfully with to withdraw my abstract submission.
>
> Best,
> Richard
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 1:50 PM Richard Ruiz <richard.physics(a)gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Dear Tom,
>
> Thank you for the detailed reply. Certainly, there is no need to apologize
> for the complications. These things happen.
>
> In short, sure, I would be interested in being a backup choice but I would
> essentially have to know by Monday in order to finalize travel, etc. I do
> not anticipate attending the meeting in person if there is not a talk.
> (Unfortunately, my travel budget is not unlimited.) I hope you can
> understand the situation.
>
> Best,
> Richard
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 8:14 PM Cridge, Tom <t.cridge(a)ucl.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> Dear Richard Ruiz,
>
> Thank you for your prompt email, indeed there are a very large number of
> abstracts submitted to our WG and given the upcoming early registration
> deadline we wished to provide some indication of the current status of all
> the talks submitted. Given the very large number of submissions, as it
> stands therefore your abstract has been accepted as a poster. However, we
> wanted to contact you as the situation regarding abstracts is not yet 100%
> clear given the complications of covid and in person attendance and also
> the potential of an additional joint session which is not yet determined,
> as a result we currently have assigned your talk as one of a few backup
> talks and there is therefore a possibility you may ultimately be able to
> give a talk in person. Nonetheless we understand if you wish not to be
> considered as a backup talk, therefore please let us know if you wish to be
> considered for this or not and apologies for the complications.
>
> Many thanks,
>
> Tom Cridge (for WG1 conveners)
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Richard Ruiz <richard.physics(a)gmail.com>
> *Sent:* 21 March 2022 19:00
> *To:* dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es>
> *Subject:* [DIS2022_wg1] Re: [Indico] Abstract Acceptance notification
> (#62)
>
>
> ⚠ Caution: External sender
>
> Dear WG1 Organizers,
>
> Thank you for the acceptance of my abstract for a poster presentation.
> Unfortunately, I requested a parallel talk. Of course, I understand that
> not all talks can be accepted. That said, if my request for a parallel talk
> cannot be honored, then I respectfully and regretfully wish to withdraw my
> abstract. Please let me know how you wish to proceed.
>
> Best wishes,
> Richard Ruiz
>
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 7:51 PM <noreply-indico-team(a)cern.ch> wrote:
>
> Dear Richard Ruiz,
>
> We're pleased to announce that your abstract "Status on electron-ion
> scattering at NLO in QCD with MadGraph5_aMC@NLO" with ID #62 has been
> accepted in track "WG1: Structure Functions and Parton Densities" (Posters).
>
> We ask you to confirm your availability to present the poster in person in
> Santiago de Compostela by an email to the corresponding WG conveners. If
> you cannot attend yourself, provide any co-author that is able to come to
> Santiago.
>
> See below a summary of your submitted abstract:
> Conference: DIS2022: XXIX International Workshop on Deep-Inelastic
> Scattering and Related Subjects
> Submitted by: Richard Ruiz
> Title: Status on electron-ion scattering at NLO in QCD with
> MadGraph5_aMC@NLO
> Primary Authors: Richard Ruiz
> Co-authors:
> Track classification: WG1: Structure Functions and Parton Densities
> Presentation type: Posters
>
> For a more detailed summary please visit the page of your abstract:
> https://indico.cern.ch/event/1072533/abstracts/137249/
>
> Kind regards,
> The organizers of DIS2022: XXIX International Workshop on Deep-Inelastic
> Scattering and Related Subjects
>
> --
> Indico :: Call for Abstracts
> https://indico.cern.ch/event/1072533/
>
>
2 years, 6 months