schedule
by Yulia Furletova
Dear Nestor,
We (WG6 group ) finished arrangements of talks in our session.
But we have few questions:
1. We do not see a slot for our joint session with WG1 ( CC to WG1 group) - at the moment we selected
last two talks on Thr. as selected for this session.
2. When is a slot for poster session? . Do we have to arrange posters there as well?
3. Also, we combined talks for Zoom-only session which is currently the last session on Wed. Please, let us know if we need to shift it to other day/timeslot.
Best, Yulia, Alessandro and Michela
2 years, 6 months
Fwd: Re: [External] DIS2022
by Yulia Furletova
It looks like we need one more remote/zoom session ( see below)
--- Forwarded message ---
From: Bernd Surrow surrow(a)temple.edu
Date: April 5, 2022 10:53:14 AM
Subject: Re: [External] DIS2022
To: Yulia Furletova yulia(a)jlab.org
CC: Silvia Dalla Torre silvia.dallatorre(a)cern.ch
Dear Yulia,
Thanks for your email.
I cannot give the talk in person due to a family matter, but need to give the talk remotely. When is the talk scheduled? Could you please confirm that this is possible?
Thanks!
Best regards,
Bernd
___________________________
|
| Bernd Surrow
|
| Professor of Physics and Department Chair
| Director Center for Online & Digital Learning
| Temple University
| Science Education and Research Center - SERC
| Department of Physics
| 1925 North 12th Street
| Philadelphia, PA 19122
| USA
|
| Temple U. Office: Science Education and Research Center - SERC
| Chair Office: SERC 406
| Research Office: SERC 420
| Detector Laboratory: SERC 447
| Clean Room Facility: SERC 565
| Chair Office Tel.: +1-215-204-7736
| Research Office Tel.: +1-215-204-7644
| Office Fax.: +1-215-204-5652
|
| Cell-phone: +1-267-317-6601
| ZOOM: https://temple.zoom.us/my/berndsurrow<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__temple.zoom.us_my_be...>
|
| Email: surrow(a)temple.edu<mailto:surrow@temple.edu>
|__________________________
2 years, 6 months
Re: [Indico] Abstract Acceptance notification (#79)
by Kevin Daniel Joel Andre
Dear Conveners,
As Nestor explained few days ago, I'll be the spearker of the talk "A common eh/hh interaction region and detector for the LHC".
I can now confirm to you that I'll give the talk online.
Please let me know if you need more information from my side.
Best regards,
Kévin
________________________________
From: ARMESTO PEREZ NESTOR [nestor.armesto(a)usc.es]
Sent: 28 March 2022 14:26
To: dis2022_wg6(a)igfae.usc.es
Cc: Kevin Daniel Joel Andre
Subject: FW: [Indico] Abstract Acceptance notification (#79)
Dear conveners,
The speaker of the talk A common $eh/hh$ interaction region and detector for the LHC will be Kevin Andre, k.andre(a)cern.ch, in cc. At this moment he cannot confirm that it will be in person.
Best regards
Nestor
------------------------------------
Néstor Armesto
Galician Institute of High Energy Physics (IGFAE)
Email: nestor.armesto(a)usc.es
Tel: +34 881 814 107
Web: https://igfae.usc.es/
Personal webpage: https://igfae.usc.es/nestor/
Follow us on Twitter @IGFAE_HEP
________________________________
De: noreply-indico-team(a)cern.ch <noreply-indico-team(a)cern.ch>
Enviado: xoves, 17 de marzo de 2022 12:23
Para: ARMESTO PEREZ NESTOR <nestor.armesto(a)usc.es>
Asunto: [Indico] Abstract Acceptance notification (#79)
Dear Nestor Armesto Perez,
We're pleased to announce that your abstract "A common $eh/hh$ interaction region and detector for the LHC" with ID #79 has been accepted in track "" (Parallel talk).
We ask you to confirm your availability to present the talk in person in Santiago de Compostela by an email to the corresponding WG conveners. If you cannot attend yourself, please provide any co-author that is able to come to Santiago.
See below a summary of your submitted abstract:
Conference: DIS2022: XXIX International Workshop on Deep-Inelastic Scattering and Related Subjects
Submitted by: Nestor Armesto Perez
Title: A common $eh/hh$ interaction region and detector for the LHC
Primary Authors: Nestor Armesto Perez
Co-authors:
Track classification:
Presentation type: Parallel talk
For a more detailed summary please visit the page of your abstract:
https://indico.cern.ch/event/1072533/abstracts/137498/
Kind regards,
The organizers of DIS2022: XXIX International Workshop on Deep-Inelastic Scattering and Related Subjects
--
Indico :: Call for Abstracts
https://indico.cern.ch/event/1072533/
2 years, 6 months
Contribution ID #328, Poster for Brian Page
by Page, Brian
Hello WG6 Conveners,
I would like to thank you for accepting my contribution for presentation as a poster. Unfortunately, due to low travel funds, I will not be able to attend DIS in person this year. I have contacted several colleagues who are familiar with my work in the hope that one could present in my place, but none of them are planning on attending in person either. Therefore, I think I will have to withdraw my contribution.
Apologies for any inconvenience this may cause you.
Brian Page
2 years, 6 months
Re: [DIS2022_wg1] [EXTERNAL] Additional session WG1 and WG6
by Yulia Furletova
Dear Tom,
It looks like now it might create some issues with authors of 386 and 407, since both of them already received “accept’ email from DIS2022.
And I’m sure both of them want to present their work and they will complain.
Please, give us few more days, maybe we could keep both. We need to see if we have some extra time in our own session.
Nestor promised to send us exact “time-schedule”
Best, Yulia.
On Apr 1, 2022, at 9:25 AM, Cridge, Tom <t.cridge(a)ucl.ac.uk<mailto:t.cridge@ucl.ac.uk>> wrote:
Hi Yulia,
Great, in that case I take it you are happy with that proposed session.
In the case of 386 and 407 you will have to contact Nestor to clone the abstracts so you can merge them and accept the new one in WG6. Similarly, for talks 62, 344, 361, 386 which will have to be converted from posters to talks. However, I have just been contacted by the author of 62 who can no longer attend due to funding issues. Therefore I would suggest to replace it with talk 331 (given we in WG1 have not been assigned any additional talks we would very much appreciate this to give us an extra space). In that case the final list would be
344, 361, 386+407 (407 from WG6 only), 67 (from WG1 only), 331 (from WG1 only) + 415 (from WG6 only).
If you are happy with that please go ahead and organise this session (we will have our own WG1 session to organise simultaneous with this one as Nestor mentioned).
Thanks again,
Tom
________________________________
From: Yulia Furletova <yulia(a)jlab.org<mailto:yulia@jlab.org>>
Sent: 01 April 2022 12:23
To: Cridge, Tom <t.cridge(a)ucl.ac.uk<mailto:t.cridge@ucl.ac.uk>>; dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es<mailto:dis2022_wg1@igfae.usc.es> <dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es<mailto:dis2022_wg1@igfae.usc.es>>
Cc: dis2022_wg6(a)igfae.usc.es<mailto:dis2022_wg6@igfae.usc.es> <dis2022_wg6(a)igfae.usc.es<mailto:dis2022_wg6@igfae.usc.es>>
Subject: Re: [DIS2022_wg1] Re: [EXTERNAL] Additional session WG1 and WG6
Hi Cridge,
I see that 386 is already acceped by WG1, and 407 is already accepted by WG6. So, at this stage it will be impossible to merge via indico. I talked to Anselm, he agrred on this merge , but at this moment it is unclear who will give a talk. Maybe you could discuss again with both of them ( with both speakers).
We will add #415 to this session.
Best, Yulia
On April 1, 2022 6:09:18 AM "Cridge, Tom" <t.cridge(a)ucl.ac.uk<mailto:t.cridge@ucl.ac.uk>> wrote:
Dear WG6,
Any response to this? Sorry to rush but we are receiving questions from some of these participants, so we wish to resolve this very quickly.
Many thanks,
Tom for WG1
________________________________
From: Cridge, Tom <t.cridge(a)ucl.ac.uk<mailto:t.cridge@ucl.ac.uk>>
Sent: 30 March 2022 21:27
To: Yulia Furletova <yulia(a)jlab.org<mailto:yulia@jlab.org>>; dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es<mailto:dis2022_wg1@igfae.usc.es> <dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es<mailto:dis2022_wg1@igfae.usc.es>>
Cc: dis2022_wg6(a)igfae.usc.es<mailto:dis2022_wg6@igfae.usc.es> <dis2022_wg6(a)igfae.usc.es<mailto:dis2022_wg6@igfae.usc.es>>
Subject: Re: [DIS2022_wg1] Re: [EXTERNAL] Additional session WG1 and WG6
Dear Yulia and WG6 conveners,
Thanks for getting back to us, given a session cannot really be longer than 6 talks in length, we would propose that we take the 4 talks we agree upon that were jointly submitted to our WGs - i.e. 62, 344, 361, 386 (and we are fine for you to merge 407 with this), that leaves two further talks, As we both have lots of talks to consider a fair way to do it then seems for us each to have one talk submitted to our individual WG included here, making up the 6 talks. Please let us know if you agree that this seems a reasonable way to divide this.
In that case we would put talk 67 that we mentioned in here and deal with our talk 331 in our own sessions, please let us know which of your talks (or a merger of two of your talks into one) you would then include.
Thanks again and best regards,
Tom (for WG1 conveners - Tom, Klaus, Barak)
________________________________
From: Yulia Furletova <yulia(a)jlab.org<mailto:yulia@jlab.org>>
Sent: 30 March 2022 17:12
To: dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es<mailto:dis2022_wg1@igfae.usc.es> <dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es<mailto:dis2022_wg1@igfae.usc.es>>
Cc: dis2022_wg6(a)igfae.usc.es<mailto:dis2022_wg6@igfae.usc.es> <dis2022_wg6(a)igfae.usc.es<mailto:dis2022_wg6@igfae.usc.es>>
Subject: [DIS2022_wg1] Re: [EXTERNAL] Additional session WG1 and WG6
⚠ Caution: External sender
Hi Klaus, all,
We are proposing to keep 407 ( and merge 386 into 407) - we do not have space for both !
62, 344, 361 are fine to us. We propose to add here 407 ( merged with 386)
It would be good if we could squeeze there couple of more talks from WG6- at the moment we are at the overflow.
for example ,
415 - CORE - a Compact Detector for the Electron-Ion Collider
0r 298 - ATHENA – A new detector proposed at the Electron-Ion Collider
84 - The impact of energy frontier DIS measurements on future hadron collider physics (HL-LHC and FCC-hh)
Your thoughts ?
Best, Yulia
It
On Mar 30, 2022, at 9:33 AM, Klaus Rabbertz <klaus.rabbertz(a)cern.ch<mailto:klaus.rabbertz@cern.ch>> wrote:
Dear WG6 conveners,
have you come to a conclusion concerning our proposal?
I fear we have to conclude on this rather quickly now.
Thank you and best regards,
Klaus (for WG1 conveners - Tom, Klaus, Barak)
Cridge, Tom wrote:
Dear WG6 conveners,
Following Nestor's hard work to obtain an additional room and confirmation we can accept a few additional talks for joint sessions earlier today, we are emailing to return to your idea of a joint session between WG1 and WG6 on future experiments. We would propose to include the following talks in this session (some of which we currently only had room for as posters):
62, 344, 361, 386 and also 331("Studying nuclear matter with jets in the sPHENIX experiment at RHIC") and 67 ("Probing free nucleons with (anti)neutrinos") , the first four were all jointly submitted to our WGs originally whilst the latter two were submitted to WG1 on this topic, therefore I include the titles for those two.
Please let us know if this would work for you and if so/not your comments on this. I would also note that currently in WG1 we are occupying one room for the whole of the timetabled parallel sessions, therefore this additional joint session would be parallel to one of our sessions and in addition to WG6's current sessions I believe. We would organise our timetable to ensure the overlapping topics were not of mutual interest.
Many thanks,
Tom (for WG1 conveners - Tom, Klaus, Barak)
_______________________________________________
DIS2022_wg1 mailing list -- dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es<mailto:dis2022_wg1@igfae.usc.es>
To unsubscribe send an email to dis2022_wg1-leave(a)igfae.usc.es<mailto:dis2022_wg1-leave@igfae.usc.es>
2 years, 6 months
Re: [DIS2022_wg1] Re: [EXTERNAL] Additional session WG1 and WG6
by Cridge, Tom
Hi Yulia,
Great, in that case I take it you are happy with that proposed session.
In the case of 386 and 407 you will have to contact Nestor to clone the abstracts so you can merge them and accept the new one in WG6. Similarly, for talks 62, 344, 361, 386 which will have to be converted from posters to talks. However, I have just been contacted by the author of 62 who can no longer attend due to funding issues. Therefore I would suggest to replace it with talk 331 (given we in WG1 have not been assigned any additional talks we would very much appreciate this to give us an extra space). In that case the final list would be
344, 361, 386+407 (407 from WG6 only), 67 (from WG1 only), 331 (from WG1 only) + 415 (from WG6 only).
If you are happy with that please go ahead and organise this session (we will have our own WG1 session to organise simultaneous with this one as Nestor mentioned).
Thanks again,
Tom
________________________________
From: Yulia Furletova <yulia(a)jlab.org>
Sent: 01 April 2022 12:23
To: Cridge, Tom <t.cridge(a)ucl.ac.uk>; dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es>
Cc: dis2022_wg6(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg6(a)igfae.usc.es>
Subject: Re: [DIS2022_wg1] Re: [EXTERNAL] Additional session WG1 and WG6
Hi Cridge,
I see that 386 is already acceped by WG1, and 407 is already accepted by WG6. So, at this stage it will be impossible to merge via indico. I talked to Anselm, he agrred on this merge , but at this moment it is unclear who will give a talk. Maybe you could discuss again with both of them ( with both speakers).
We will add #415 to this session.
Best, Yulia
On April 1, 2022 6:09:18 AM "Cridge, Tom" <t.cridge(a)ucl.ac.uk> wrote:
Dear WG6,
Any response to this? Sorry to rush but we are receiving questions from some of these participants, so we wish to resolve this very quickly.
Many thanks,
Tom for WG1
________________________________
From: Cridge, Tom <t.cridge(a)ucl.ac.uk>
Sent: 30 March 2022 21:27
To: Yulia Furletova <yulia(a)jlab.org>; dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es>
Cc: dis2022_wg6(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg6(a)igfae.usc.es>
Subject: Re: [DIS2022_wg1] Re: [EXTERNAL] Additional session WG1 and WG6
Dear Yulia and WG6 conveners,
Thanks for getting back to us, given a session cannot really be longer than 6 talks in length, we would propose that we take the 4 talks we agree upon that were jointly submitted to our WGs - i.e. 62, 344, 361, 386 (and we are fine for you to merge 407 with this), that leaves two further talks, As we both have lots of talks to consider a fair way to do it then seems for us each to have one talk submitted to our individual WG included here, making up the 6 talks. Please let us know if you agree that this seems a reasonable way to divide this.
In that case we would put talk 67 that we mentioned in here and deal with our talk 331 in our own sessions, please let us know which of your talks (or a merger of two of your talks into one) you would then include.
Thanks again and best regards,
Tom (for WG1 conveners - Tom, Klaus, Barak)
________________________________
From: Yulia Furletova <yulia(a)jlab.org>
Sent: 30 March 2022 17:12
To: dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es>
Cc: dis2022_wg6(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg6(a)igfae.usc.es>
Subject: [DIS2022_wg1] Re: [EXTERNAL] Additional session WG1 and WG6
⚠ Caution: External sender
Hi Klaus, all,
We are proposing to keep 407 ( and merge 386 into 407) - we do not have space for both !
62, 344, 361 are fine to us. We propose to add here 407 ( merged with 386)
It would be good if we could squeeze there couple of more talks from WG6- at the moment we are at the overflow.
for example ,
415 - CORE - a Compact Detector for the Electron-Ion Collider
0r 298 - ATHENA – A new detector proposed at the Electron-Ion Collider
84 - The impact of energy frontier DIS measurements on future hadron collider physics (HL-LHC and FCC-hh)
Your thoughts ?
Best, Yulia
It
On Mar 30, 2022, at 9:33 AM, Klaus Rabbertz <klaus.rabbertz(a)cern.ch<mailto:klaus.rabbertz@cern.ch>> wrote:
Dear WG6 conveners,
have you come to a conclusion concerning our proposal?
I fear we have to conclude on this rather quickly now.
Thank you and best regards,
Klaus (for WG1 conveners - Tom, Klaus, Barak)
Cridge, Tom wrote:
Dear WG6 conveners,
Following Nestor's hard work to obtain an additional room and confirmation we can accept a few additional talks for joint sessions earlier today, we are emailing to return to your idea of a joint session between WG1 and WG6 on future experiments. We would propose to include the following talks in this session (some of which we currently only had room for as posters):
62, 344, 361, 386 and also 331("Studying nuclear matter with jets in the sPHENIX experiment at RHIC") and 67 ("Probing free nucleons with (anti)neutrinos") , the first four were all jointly submitted to our WGs originally whilst the latter two were submitted to WG1 on this topic, therefore I include the titles for those two.
Please let us know if this would work for you and if so/not your comments on this. I would also note that currently in WG1 we are occupying one room for the whole of the timetabled parallel sessions, therefore this additional joint session would be parallel to one of our sessions and in addition to WG6's current sessions I believe. We would organise our timetable to ensure the overlapping topics were not of mutual interest.
Many thanks,
Tom (for WG1 conveners - Tom, Klaus, Barak)
_______________________________________________
DIS2022_wg1 mailing list -- dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es<mailto:dis2022_wg1@igfae.usc.es>
To unsubscribe send an email to dis2022_wg1-leave(a)igfae.usc.es<mailto:dis2022_wg1-leave@igfae.usc.es>
2 years, 6 months
Re: [DIS2022_wg1] Re: [EXTERNAL] Additional session WG1 and WG6
by Yulia Furletova
Hi Cridge,
I see that 386 is already acceped by WG1, and 407 is already accepted by WG6. So, at this stage it will be impossible to merge via indico. I talked to Anselm, he agrred on this merge , but at this moment it is unclear who will give a talk. Maybe you could discuss again with both of them ( with both speakers).
We will add #415 to this session.
Best, Yulia
On April 1, 2022 6:09:18 AM "Cridge, Tom" <t.cridge(a)ucl.ac.uk> wrote:
Dear WG6,
Any response to this? Sorry to rush but we are receiving questions from some of these participants, so we wish to resolve this very quickly.
Many thanks,
Tom for WG1
________________________________
From: Cridge, Tom <t.cridge(a)ucl.ac.uk>
Sent: 30 March 2022 21:27
To: Yulia Furletova <yulia(a)jlab.org>; dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es>
Cc: dis2022_wg6(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg6(a)igfae.usc.es>
Subject: Re: [DIS2022_wg1] Re: [EXTERNAL] Additional session WG1 and WG6
Dear Yulia and WG6 conveners,
Thanks for getting back to us, given a session cannot really be longer than 6 talks in length, we would propose that we take the 4 talks we agree upon that were jointly submitted to our WGs - i.e. 62, 344, 361, 386 (and we are fine for you to merge 407 with this), that leaves two further talks, As we both have lots of talks to consider a fair way to do it then seems for us each to have one talk submitted to our individual WG included here, making up the 6 talks. Please let us know if you agree that this seems a reasonable way to divide this.
In that case we would put talk 67 that we mentioned in here and deal with our talk 331 in our own sessions, please let us know which of your talks (or a merger of two of your talks into one) you would then include.
Thanks again and best regards,
Tom (for WG1 conveners - Tom, Klaus, Barak)
________________________________
From: Yulia Furletova <yulia(a)jlab.org>
Sent: 30 March 2022 17:12
To: dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es>
Cc: dis2022_wg6(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg6(a)igfae.usc.es>
Subject: [DIS2022_wg1] Re: [EXTERNAL] Additional session WG1 and WG6
⚠ Caution: External sender
Hi Klaus, all,
We are proposing to keep 407 ( and merge 386 into 407) - we do not have space for both !
62, 344, 361 are fine to us. We propose to add here 407 ( merged with 386)
It would be good if we could squeeze there couple of more talks from WG6- at the moment we are at the overflow.
for example ,
415 - CORE - a Compact Detector for the Electron-Ion Collider
0r 298 - ATHENA – A new detector proposed at the Electron-Ion Collider
84 - The impact of energy frontier DIS measurements on future hadron collider physics (HL-LHC and FCC-hh)
Your thoughts ?
Best, Yulia
It
On Mar 30, 2022, at 9:33 AM, Klaus Rabbertz <klaus.rabbertz(a)cern.ch<mailto:klaus.rabbertz@cern.ch>> wrote:
Dear WG6 conveners,
have you come to a conclusion concerning our proposal?
I fear we have to conclude on this rather quickly now.
Thank you and best regards,
Klaus (for WG1 conveners - Tom, Klaus, Barak)
Cridge, Tom wrote:
Dear WG6 conveners,
Following Nestor's hard work to obtain an additional room and confirmation we can accept a few additional talks for joint sessions earlier today, we are emailing to return to your idea of a joint session between WG1 and WG6 on future experiments. We would propose to include the following talks in this session (some of which we currently only had room for as posters):
62, 344, 361, 386 and also 331("Studying nuclear matter with jets in the sPHENIX experiment at RHIC") and 67 ("Probing free nucleons with (anti)neutrinos") , the first four were all jointly submitted to our WGs originally whilst the latter two were submitted to WG1 on this topic, therefore I include the titles for those two.
Please let us know if this would work for you and if so/not your comments on this. I would also note that currently in WG1 we are occupying one room for the whole of the timetabled parallel sessions, therefore this additional joint session would be parallel to one of our sessions and in addition to WG6's current sessions I believe. We would organise our timetable to ensure the overlapping topics were not of mutual interest.
Many thanks,
Tom (for WG1 conveners - Tom, Klaus, Barak)
_______________________________________________
DIS2022_wg1 mailing list -- dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es<mailto:dis2022_wg1@igfae.usc.es>
To unsubscribe send an email to dis2022_wg1-leave(a)igfae.usc.es<mailto:dis2022_wg1-leave@igfae.usc.es>
2 years, 6 months
Re: [DIS2022_wg1] Re: [EXTERNAL] Additional session WG1 and WG6
by Cridge, Tom
Dear WG6,
Any response to this? Sorry to rush but we are receiving questions from some of these participants, so we wish to resolve this very quickly.
Many thanks,
Tom for WG1
________________________________
From: Cridge, Tom <t.cridge(a)ucl.ac.uk>
Sent: 30 March 2022 21:27
To: Yulia Furletova <yulia(a)jlab.org>; dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es>
Cc: dis2022_wg6(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg6(a)igfae.usc.es>
Subject: Re: [DIS2022_wg1] Re: [EXTERNAL] Additional session WG1 and WG6
Dear Yulia and WG6 conveners,
Thanks for getting back to us, given a session cannot really be longer than 6 talks in length, we would propose that we take the 4 talks we agree upon that were jointly submitted to our WGs - i.e. 62, 344, 361, 386 (and we are fine for you to merge 407 with this), that leaves two further talks, As we both have lots of talks to consider a fair way to do it then seems for us each to have one talk submitted to our individual WG included here, making up the 6 talks. Please let us know if you agree that this seems a reasonable way to divide this.
In that case we would put talk 67 that we mentioned in here and deal with our talk 331 in our own sessions, please let us know which of your talks (or a merger of two of your talks into one) you would then include.
Thanks again and best regards,
Tom (for WG1 conveners - Tom, Klaus, Barak)
________________________________
From: Yulia Furletova <yulia(a)jlab.org>
Sent: 30 March 2022 17:12
To: dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es>
Cc: dis2022_wg6(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg6(a)igfae.usc.es>
Subject: [DIS2022_wg1] Re: [EXTERNAL] Additional session WG1 and WG6
⚠ Caution: External sender
Hi Klaus, all,
We are proposing to keep 407 ( and merge 386 into 407) - we do not have space for both !
62, 344, 361 are fine to us. We propose to add here 407 ( merged with 386)
It would be good if we could squeeze there couple of more talks from WG6- at the moment we are at the overflow.
for example ,
415 - CORE - a Compact Detector for the Electron-Ion Collider
0r 298 - ATHENA – A new detector proposed at the Electron-Ion Collider
84 - The impact of energy frontier DIS measurements on future hadron collider physics (HL-LHC and FCC-hh)
Your thoughts ?
Best, Yulia
It
On Mar 30, 2022, at 9:33 AM, Klaus Rabbertz <klaus.rabbertz(a)cern.ch<mailto:klaus.rabbertz@cern.ch>> wrote:
Dear WG6 conveners,
have you come to a conclusion concerning our proposal?
I fear we have to conclude on this rather quickly now.
Thank you and best regards,
Klaus (for WG1 conveners - Tom, Klaus, Barak)
Cridge, Tom wrote:
Dear WG6 conveners,
Following Nestor's hard work to obtain an additional room and confirmation we can accept a few additional talks for joint sessions earlier today, we are emailing to return to your idea of a joint session between WG1 and WG6 on future experiments. We would propose to include the following talks in this session (some of which we currently only had room for as posters):
62, 344, 361, 386 and also 331("Studying nuclear matter with jets in the sPHENIX experiment at RHIC") and 67 ("Probing free nucleons with (anti)neutrinos") , the first four were all jointly submitted to our WGs originally whilst the latter two were submitted to WG1 on this topic, therefore I include the titles for those two.
Please let us know if this would work for you and if so/not your comments on this. I would also note that currently in WG1 we are occupying one room for the whole of the timetabled parallel sessions, therefore this additional joint session would be parallel to one of our sessions and in addition to WG6's current sessions I believe. We would organise our timetable to ensure the overlapping topics were not of mutual interest.
Many thanks,
Tom (for WG1 conveners - Tom, Klaus, Barak)
_______________________________________________
DIS2022_wg1 mailing list -- dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es<mailto:dis2022_wg1@igfae.usc.es>
To unsubscribe send an email to dis2022_wg1-leave(a)igfae.usc.es<mailto:dis2022_wg1-leave@igfae.usc.es>
2 years, 6 months
