DIS22 talk cancellation
by Karolina Lavickova
Dear WG1 conveners,
I am pleased that you accepted my abstract with ID #200 "Exclusive pi0 muoproduction at COMPASS". However, I apologize but I need to cancel the talk. It turned out that I cannot participate in person and neither does my colleague.
Thank you.
Best regards,
Karolina Lavickova
2 years, 7 months
Re: [EXTERNAL] RE: extra joint session with WG1 ?
by Yulia Furletova
Yes, we will keep this on-hold.
On March 14, 2022 12:58:33 PM ARMESTO PEREZ NESTOR <nestor.armesto(a)usc.es> wrote:
Dear Yulia and WG1 conveners,
For another session we require an additional room or extended the planned ones. For the former I would need some days to investigate. Can you keep this on hold for some days?
Best
Nestor
------------------------------------
Néstor Armesto
Galician Institute of High Energy Physics (IGFAE)
Email: nestor.armesto(a)usc.es
Tel: +34 881 814 107
Web: https://igfae.usc.es/
Personal webpage: https://igfae.usc.es/nestor/
Follow us on Twitter @IGFAE_HEP
________________________________
De: Yulia Furletova <yulia(a)jlab.org>
Enviado: luns, 14 de marzo de 2022 12:53
Para: dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es>
CC: ARMESTO PEREZ NESTOR <nestor.armesto(a)usc.es>
Asunto: extra joint session with WG1 ?
Dear WG1 conveners, Nestor,
We have few talks which we would like to suggest for an additional joint session with WG1 :
#62, 344, 361 , 386, 399
Unfortunately we do not have space in our session.
Best, Yulia.
2 years, 7 months
extra joint session with WG1 ?
by Yulia Furletova
Dear WG1 conveners, Nestor,
We have few talks which we would like to suggest for an additional joint session with WG1 :
#62, 344, 361 , 386, 399
Unfortunately we do not have space in our session.
Best, Yulia.
2 years, 7 months
Re: [DIS2022_wg2] Re: Abstracts submitted to WG2 and WG1 for DIS 2022
by Daria Sokhan
Dear WG1 conveners,
We have finalised our list of abstracts and here are the results concerning
those which were also submitted to WG1:
104 -- poster
126 -- poster
149 -- we will ask to merge with 145 (submitted only to our session).
162 -- accepted (was also submitted to WG6).
174 -- rejected (was also submitted to WG4)
261 -- rejected (was also submitted to WG4)
270 -- accepted (was also submitted to WG4)
350 -- accepted
Please let us know if you have any questions or want to discuss any of
these!
Many thanks,
Guillaume, Rafal and Daria
On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 at 12:32, Cridge, Tom <t.cridge(a)ucl.ac.uk> wrote:
> Dear WG2 conveners,
>
> We have now made several of the decisions regarding our abstracts and are
> just waiting on your input to finalise things as we have communicated with
> the other WGs on shared talks. As a reminder the talks shared between our
> WGs that we do not wish to take (some of which are also shared with other
> groups) are:
>
> 104, 126, 350 (these are shared between our WGs and we do not intend to
> take them, regarding 126 we already have a couple of talks from/about STAR
> so we left this one)
>
> 162 (shared with WG6), we do not wish to take this as it is not too
> relevant to our WG, as far as we know WG6 also are not currently taking it
>
> 174 and 270 (both shared with WG4) we do not intend to accept these and we
> believe neither do WG4
>
> 149 and 261 are abstracts submitted only to our WG1 (and for 261 also to
> WG4) but we do not intend to take them and thought they could be relevant
> for your WG2 so have also made them available for you to view on indico, we
> believe WG4 do not intend to take 261 either, please let us know your
> thoughts on these.
>
> Once we have your responses on this we can finalise our decisions on
> abstracts to accept, reject, for backup, etc so we would appreciate your
> swift response on this.
>
> Many thanks again,
>
> Tom for WG1 conveners (Tom, Barak, Klaus)
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Cridge, Tom <t.cridge(a)ucl.ac.uk>
> *Sent:* 09 March 2022 14:52
> *To:* dis2022_wg2(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg2(a)igfae.usc.es>
> *Cc:* dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es>
> *Subject:* [DIS2022_wg1] Re: Abstracts submitted to WG2 and WG1 for DIS
> 2022
>
> Dear WG2 conveners,
>
> I am emailing to ask if you have had time to consider this yet? I am
> asking as we will need to cooperate somewhat on the abstract acceptances
> where they are shared and we wish to conclude this as soon as possible.
>
> Many thanks,
>
> Tom (for WG1 conveners)
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Cridge, Tom <t.cridge(a)ucl.ac.uk>
> *Sent:* 06 March 2022 18:03
> *To:* dis2022_wg2(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg2(a)igfae.usc.es>
> *Cc:* dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es>
> *Subject:* [DIS2022_wg1] Abstracts submitted to WG2 and WG1 for DIS 2022
>
>
> ⚠ Caution: External sender
>
> Dear WG2 conveners,
>
> We wanted to contact you regarding shared abstracts between our two WGs.
> We believe there are 6 abstracts shared between our WGs (two of which are
> also shared with WG4).
>
> In terms of these shared abstracts we felt 104, 126, 162 and 350 all would
> fit better in your session than ours, with 162 and 350 specifically
> considering small x whilst for 126 we already have a couple of talks from
> STAR. There are also abstracts 174 and 270 shared also with WG4 which we do
> not intend to take in WG1 given the tight constraints we all have.
>
> We also had abstract 149 submitted only to our WG1, which we are currently
> not intending to consider but may be of interest to your group, therefore I
> attach it to this email.
>
> Please let us know if you are taking any of these abstracts for talks and
> feel free to contact us with your thoughts on this or if you have any
> queries.
>
> Many thanks,
> Tom for WG1 conveners (Tom, Klaus, Barak)
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Cridge, Tom <t.cridge(a)ucl.ac.uk>
> *Sent:* 06 March 2022 18:03
> *To:* dis2022_wg2(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg2(a)igfae.usc.es>
> *Cc:* dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es>
> *Subject:* [DIS2022_wg1] Abstracts submitted to WG2 and WG1 for DIS 2022
>
>
> ⚠ Caution: External sender
>
> Dear WG2 conveners,
>
> We wanted to contact you regarding shared abstracts between our two WGs.
> We believe there are 6 abstracts shared between our WGs (two of which are
> also shared with WG4).
>
> In terms of these shared abstracts we felt 104, 126, 162 and 350 all would
> fit better in your session than ours, with 162 and 350 specifically
> considering small x whilst for 126 we already have a couple of talks from
> STAR. There are also abstracts 174 and 270 shared also with WG4 which we do
> not intend to take in WG1 given the tight constraints we all have.
>
> We also had abstract 149 submitted only to our WG1, which we are currently
> not intending to consider but may be of interest to your group, therefore I
> attach it to this email.
>
> Please let us know if you are taking any of these abstracts for talks and
> feel free to contact us with your thoughts on this or if you have any
> queries.
>
> Many thanks,
> Tom for WG1 conveners (Tom, Klaus, Barak)
>
>
2 years, 7 months
Re: [DIS2022] DIS2022: XXIX International Workshop on Deep-Inelastic Scattering and Related Subjects
by ARMESTO PEREZ NESTOR
Dear conveners,
Please find this email bu Andrea Pelloni.
Best regards
Nestor
------------------------------------
Néstor Armesto
Galician Institute of High Energy Physics (IGFAE)
Email: nestor.armesto(a)usc.es
Tel: +34 881 814 107
Web: https://igfae.usc.es/
Personal webpage: https://igfae.usc.es/nestor/
Follow us on Twitter @IGFAE_HEP
________________________________
De: apelloni90(a)gmail.com <apelloni90(a)gmail.com>
Enviado: venres, 11 de marzo de 2022 10:36
Para: dis2022(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022(a)igfae.usc.es>
Asunto: [DIS2022] DIS2022: XXIX International Workshop on Deep-Inelastic Scattering and Related Subjects
Dear All,
I couldn't find the email for my WG conveners, so I'm writing you to
confirm my partecipation at DIS2020 with "DIS at 4-loops with
differential equations" (ID #184) for the "WG1: Structure Functions and
Parton Densities" parallel session.
Best Regards,
Andrea Pelloni
_______________________________________________
DIS2022 mailing list -- dis2022(a)igfae.usc.es
To unsubscribe send an email to dis2022-leave(a)igfae.usc.es
2 years, 7 months
Re: [DIS2022_wg2] Re: Abstracts submitted to WG2 and WG1 for DIS 2022
by Daria Sokhan
Dear Tom,
Thank you. We are having a meeting in a couple of hours to discuss and
finalise our list -- we'll email straight after that!
Thanks,
Daria
On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 at 12:32, Cridge, Tom <t.cridge(a)ucl.ac.uk> wrote:
> Dear WG2 conveners,
>
> We have now made several of the decisions regarding our abstracts and are
> just waiting on your input to finalise things as we have communicated with
> the other WGs on shared talks. As a reminder the talks shared between our
> WGs that we do not wish to take (some of which are also shared with other
> groups) are:
>
> 104, 126, 350 (these are shared between our WGs and we do not intend to
> take them, regarding 126 we already have a couple of talks from/about STAR
> so we left this one)
>
> 162 (shared with WG6), we do not wish to take this as it is not too
> relevant to our WG, as far as we know WG6 also are not currently taking it
>
> 174 and 270 (both shared with WG4) we do not intend to accept these and we
> believe neither do WG4
>
> 149 and 261 are abstracts submitted only to our WG1 (and for 261 also to
> WG4) but we do not intend to take them and thought they could be relevant
> for your WG2 so have also made them available for you to view on indico, we
> believe WG4 do not intend to take 261 either, please let us know your
> thoughts on these.
>
> Once we have your responses on this we can finalise our decisions on
> abstracts to accept, reject, for backup, etc so we would appreciate your
> swift response on this.
>
> Many thanks again,
>
> Tom for WG1 conveners (Tom, Barak, Klaus)
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Cridge, Tom <t.cridge(a)ucl.ac.uk>
> *Sent:* 09 March 2022 14:52
> *To:* dis2022_wg2(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg2(a)igfae.usc.es>
> *Cc:* dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es>
> *Subject:* [DIS2022_wg1] Re: Abstracts submitted to WG2 and WG1 for DIS
> 2022
>
> Dear WG2 conveners,
>
> I am emailing to ask if you have had time to consider this yet? I am
> asking as we will need to cooperate somewhat on the abstract acceptances
> where they are shared and we wish to conclude this as soon as possible.
>
> Many thanks,
>
> Tom (for WG1 conveners)
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Cridge, Tom <t.cridge(a)ucl.ac.uk>
> *Sent:* 06 March 2022 18:03
> *To:* dis2022_wg2(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg2(a)igfae.usc.es>
> *Cc:* dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es>
> *Subject:* [DIS2022_wg1] Abstracts submitted to WG2 and WG1 for DIS 2022
>
>
> ⚠ Caution: External sender
>
> Dear WG2 conveners,
>
> We wanted to contact you regarding shared abstracts between our two WGs.
> We believe there are 6 abstracts shared between our WGs (two of which are
> also shared with WG4).
>
> In terms of these shared abstracts we felt 104, 126, 162 and 350 all would
> fit better in your session than ours, with 162 and 350 specifically
> considering small x whilst for 126 we already have a couple of talks from
> STAR. There are also abstracts 174 and 270 shared also with WG4 which we do
> not intend to take in WG1 given the tight constraints we all have.
>
> We also had abstract 149 submitted only to our WG1, which we are currently
> not intending to consider but may be of interest to your group, therefore I
> attach it to this email.
>
> Please let us know if you are taking any of these abstracts for talks and
> feel free to contact us with your thoughts on this or if you have any
> queries.
>
> Many thanks,
> Tom for WG1 conveners (Tom, Klaus, Barak)
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Cridge, Tom <t.cridge(a)ucl.ac.uk>
> *Sent:* 06 March 2022 18:03
> *To:* dis2022_wg2(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg2(a)igfae.usc.es>
> *Cc:* dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es>
> *Subject:* [DIS2022_wg1] Abstracts submitted to WG2 and WG1 for DIS 2022
>
>
> ⚠ Caution: External sender
>
> Dear WG2 conveners,
>
> We wanted to contact you regarding shared abstracts between our two WGs.
> We believe there are 6 abstracts shared between our WGs (two of which are
> also shared with WG4).
>
> In terms of these shared abstracts we felt 104, 126, 162 and 350 all would
> fit better in your session than ours, with 162 and 350 specifically
> considering small x whilst for 126 we already have a couple of talks from
> STAR. There are also abstracts 174 and 270 shared also with WG4 which we do
> not intend to take in WG1 given the tight constraints we all have.
>
> We also had abstract 149 submitted only to our WG1, which we are currently
> not intending to consider but may be of interest to your group, therefore I
> attach it to this email.
>
> Please let us know if you are taking any of these abstracts for talks and
> feel free to contact us with your thoughts on this or if you have any
> queries.
>
> Many thanks,
> Tom for WG1 conveners (Tom, Klaus, Barak)
>
>
2 years, 7 months
Re: Abstracts submitted to WG2 and WG1 for DIS 2022
by Cridge, Tom
Dear WG2 conveners,
We have now made several of the decisions regarding our abstracts and are just waiting on your input to finalise things as we have communicated with the other WGs on shared talks. As a reminder the talks shared between our WGs that we do not wish to take (some of which are also shared with other groups) are:
104, 126, 350 (these are shared between our WGs and we do not intend to take them, regarding 126 we already have a couple of talks from/about STAR so we left this one)
162 (shared with WG6), we do not wish to take this as it is not too relevant to our WG, as far as we know WG6 also are not currently taking it
174 and 270 (both shared with WG4) we do not intend to accept these and we believe neither do WG4
149 and 261 are abstracts submitted only to our WG1 (and for 261 also to WG4) but we do not intend to take them and thought they could be relevant for your WG2 so have also made them available for you to view on indico, we believe WG4 do not intend to take 261 either, please let us know your thoughts on these.
Once we have your responses on this we can finalise our decisions on abstracts to accept, reject, for backup, etc so we would appreciate your swift response on this.
Many thanks again,
Tom for WG1 conveners (Tom, Barak, Klaus)
________________________________
From: Cridge, Tom <t.cridge(a)ucl.ac.uk>
Sent: 09 March 2022 14:52
To: dis2022_wg2(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg2(a)igfae.usc.es>
Cc: dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es>
Subject: [DIS2022_wg1] Re: Abstracts submitted to WG2 and WG1 for DIS 2022
Dear WG2 conveners,
I am emailing to ask if you have had time to consider this yet? I am asking as we will need to cooperate somewhat on the abstract acceptances where they are shared and we wish to conclude this as soon as possible.
Many thanks,
Tom (for WG1 conveners)
________________________________
From: Cridge, Tom <t.cridge(a)ucl.ac.uk>
Sent: 06 March 2022 18:03
To: dis2022_wg2(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg2(a)igfae.usc.es>
Cc: dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es>
Subject: [DIS2022_wg1] Abstracts submitted to WG2 and WG1 for DIS 2022
⚠ Caution: External sender
Dear WG2 conveners,
We wanted to contact you regarding shared abstracts between our two WGs. We believe there are 6 abstracts shared between our WGs (two of which are also shared with WG4).
In terms of these shared abstracts we felt 104, 126, 162 and 350 all would fit better in your session than ours, with 162 and 350 specifically considering small x whilst for 126 we already have a couple of talks from STAR. There are also abstracts 174 and 270 shared also with WG4 which we do not intend to take in WG1 given the tight constraints we all have.
We also had abstract 149 submitted only to our WG1, which we are currently not intending to consider but may be of interest to your group, therefore I attach it to this email.
Please let us know if you are taking any of these abstracts for talks and feel free to contact us with your thoughts on this or if you have any queries.
Many thanks,
Tom for WG1 conveners (Tom, Klaus, Barak)
________________________________
From: Cridge, Tom <t.cridge(a)ucl.ac.uk>
Sent: 06 March 2022 18:03
To: dis2022_wg2(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg2(a)igfae.usc.es>
Cc: dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es>
Subject: [DIS2022_wg1] Abstracts submitted to WG2 and WG1 for DIS 2022
⚠ Caution: External sender
Dear WG2 conveners,
We wanted to contact you regarding shared abstracts between our two WGs. We believe there are 6 abstracts shared between our WGs (two of which are also shared with WG4).
In terms of these shared abstracts we felt 104, 126, 162 and 350 all would fit better in your session than ours, with 162 and 350 specifically considering small x whilst for 126 we already have a couple of talks from STAR. There are also abstracts 174 and 270 shared also with WG4 which we do not intend to take in WG1 given the tight constraints we all have.
We also had abstract 149 submitted only to our WG1, which we are currently not intending to consider but may be of interest to your group, therefore I attach it to this email.
Please let us know if you are taking any of these abstracts for talks and feel free to contact us with your thoughts on this or if you have any queries.
Many thanks,
Tom for WG1 conveners (Tom, Klaus, Barak)
2 years, 7 months
In person attendance #234
by Kadir Utku Can
Dear WG1 Conveners,
Thank you for accepting my abstract for a parallel talk. I am asked to confirm my in-person attendance.
Unfortunately I am not in a position to attend the workshop physically. I was hoping that I could present my talk virtually.
If that won't possible, I can maybe delegate it to one of my colleagues but I need to confirm that first.
Looking forward to your reply.
Best wishes,
Utku
-----------------------------------------------------------
Dr. K. Utku Can
Postdoctoral Researcher
CSSM, Department of Physics, Faculty of Sciences
The University of Adelaide
Adelaide, SA 5005 Australia
Tel: +61 8 8313 5996
kadirutku.can [at] adelaide.edu.au
Cricos Provider Number 00123M
-----------------------------------------------------------
IMPORTANT: This message may contain confidential or legally privileged information. If you think it was sent to you by mistake, please delete all copies and advise the sender. For the purposes of the SPAM Act 2003, this email is authorised by The University of Adelaide
Think green: read on the screen.
2 years, 7 months
Re: [Indico] Abstract Acceptance notification (#20)
by Aleksander Kusina
Dear WG1 convenors,
I want to confirm that I will participate in person in the conference
and will present the talk.
Best wishes,
Aleksander Kusina
On 10.03.2022 20:09, noreply-indico-team(a)cern.ch wrote:
> Dear Aleksander Kusina,
>
> We're pleased to announce that your abstract "Short-range correlations and the phenomenological determination of nuclear PDFs" with ID #20 has been accepted in track "WG1: Structure Functions and Parton Densities" (Parallel talk).
>
> We ask you to confirm your availability to present the talk in person in Santiago de Compostela by an email to the corresponding WG conveners. If you cannot attend yourself, please provide any co-author that is able to come to Santiago.
>
> See below a summary of your submitted abstract:
> Conference: DIS2022: XXIX International Workshop on Deep-Inelastic Scattering and Related Subjects
> Submitted by: Aleksander Kusina
> Title: Short-range correlations and the phenomenological determination of nuclear PDFs
> Primary Authors: Aleksander Kusina, Tomas Jezo, Fred Olness
> Co-authors:
> Track classification: WG1: Structure Functions and Parton Densities
> Presentation type: Parallel talk
>
> For a more detailed summary please visit the page of your abstract:
> https://indico.cern.ch/event/1072533/abstracts/136944/
>
> Kind regards,
> The organizers of DIS2022: XXIX International Workshop on Deep-Inelastic Scattering and Related Subjects
>
> --
> Indico :: Call for Abstracts
> https://indico.cern.ch/event/1072533/
--
==================================================
Aleksander Kusina
Department of Particle Physics (NZ42),
Institute of Nuclear Physics PAN
ul. Radzikowskiego 152,
31-342 Kraków, Poland
e-mail: Aleksander.Kusina(a)ifj.edu.pl
phone: (+48 12) 662-8360
==================================================
2 years, 7 months
