DIS2022 participation
by maria ubiali
Dear WG1 convenors,
I have received the notification that my abstract "A new generation of
simultaneous fits to LHC data using deep learning" with ID #24 has been
accepted in your track "WG1: Structure Functions and Parton Densities".
I would be happy to participate in person at the conference in Santiago.
Due to teaching constraints, I would be able to arrive on Tuesday late
afternoon and leave on Thursday morning. Would it be possible to schedule
my talk on Wednesday? If this is not possible, please let me know and I
will try to reschedule my lectures.
Best regards
Maria Ubiali
--
Dr. Maria Ubiali
University Lecturer
and
Royal Society Dorothy Hodgkin Research Fellow
DAMTP, Centre for Mathematical Sciences
Cambridge CB3 0WA
United Kingdom
2 years, 6 months
Re: DIS2022 WG1 abstracts
by Pit Duwentäster
Dear Tom, Barak, Klaus,
Thanks for your note, and we are pleased to hear of the considerable
interest in this year's DIS workshop.
We briefly discussed the possibility of merging the "Heavy Quark" and
"Neutrino" talks, but concluded this would be difficult as the topics
are, in fact, quite separate and focus on very different data sets.
We've attached the cover pages of the current drafts (both papers will
be on the ArXiV before the meeting) to highlight the contrasting
objective of each.
The heavy quark study is led by Pit Duwentaester and Michael Klasen, and
is looking at the heavy quark meson data from RHIC and LHC. This
analysis provides new constraints on the gluon PDF in the small-x
region. The output of this study is a new nCTEQ15HQ PDF set.
In contrast, the neutrino study (led by Khoirul Faiq Muzakkaand and
Karol Kovarik) uses the results of the new nCTEQ15WZSIH PDFs, along with
three independent compatibility criteria to definitively address the
observed tensions between the DIS charged current and neutral current
processes. The output of this study is a new nCTEQ15nu PDF set.
We certainly appreciate the limited time available for your working
group. Therefore, if it might be possible to have two separate shorter
talks, that would be much preferable for us. We could coordinate to
eliminate any overlapping introductory material, thus enabling the
speakers to adequately cover the core elements.
Thank you for your consideration,
Pit Duwentäster, Khoirul Faiq Muzakka, Karol Kovarik, Michael Klasen,
Fred Olness
On 15.03.22 19:31, Cridge, Tom wrote:
> Dear colleagues,
>
> I am writing to you regarding your abstracts submitted to WG1:
> Structure Functions and Parton Densities at DIS2022 in Santiago de
> Compostela. As you may be aware, being one of the first in person
> conferences in a long time, we have received an extraordinary number
> of abstract submissions. As a result, we are writing to ask you if it
> might be possible to merge two of the abstracts submitted by
> yourselves on behalf of the nCTEQ collaboration into one talk. The
> abstracts we refer to are "Constraining the nuclear gluon PDF with
> heavy quark production data" (abstract number 19 submitted by Pit
> Duwentaester) and "nPDF Analysis with Neutrino DIS Data" (abstract
> number 50 submitted byKhoirul Faiq Muzakkaand andKarol Kovarik).
> Please let us know if this is would be fine for you as the authors as
> soon as possible and thanks in advance for your understanding.
>
> Many thanks,
>
> Tom Cridge on behalf of the WG1 conveners (Tom, Barak, Klaus)
>
>
2 years, 6 months
Re: Request for talk acceptance letter
by Cridge, Tom
Hi Nestor,
Great thanks, the talk is entitled "Toward precise and robust unpolarized PDFs" and it will be presented by Aurore Courtoy, she is at Instituto de Física, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Thanks for dealing with this.
As for the proposed joint/extra session with WG6, they are the ones proposing it and I believe they proposed it as an extra session additional to those they currently had. Indeed in WG1 we would not have space to accommodate a joint session with WG6 within our current schedule I don't think as that would essentially mean us accepting even fewer talks.
Best,
Tom
________________________________
From: ARMESTO PEREZ NESTOR <nestor.armesto(a)usc.es>
Sent: 17 March 2022 10:28
To: Cridge, Tom <t.cridge(a)ucl.ac.uk>
Cc: dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es>
Subject: RE: Request for talk acceptance letter
⚠ Caution: External sender
Hi,
I can write a formal letter. Can you tell me the title of the talk and his/her institution and I prepare the letter?
Best
Nesotr
------------------------------------
Néstor Armesto
Galician Institute of High Energy Physics (IGFAE)
Email: nestor.armesto(a)usc.es
Tel: +34 881 814 107
Web: https://igfae.usc.es/
Personal webpage: https://igfae.usc.es/nestor/
Follow us on Twitter @IGFAE_HEP
________________________________
De: Cridge, Tom <t.cridge(a)ucl.ac.uk>
Enviado: mércores, 16 de marzo de 2022 20:05
Para: ARMESTO PEREZ NESTOR <nestor.armesto(a)usc.es>
CC: dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es>
Asunto: Request for talk acceptance letter
Dear Nestor,
One of the authors of a talk we have accepted has just asked us to provide an acceptance letter for their talk clearly stating that they (Aurore Courtoy) will give a talk so that they can provide it to their institution to demonstrate their need to attend the conference (in person). Do you have anything we can provide for this or should we just write a more formal email from ourselves as conveners to this effect?
Thanks again,
Tom (for WG1 conveners)
2 years, 6 months
Re: Request for talk acceptance letter
by ARMESTO PEREZ NESTOR
Hi,
I can write a formal letter. Can you tell me the title of the talk and his/her institution and I prepare the letter?
Best
Nesotr
------------------------------------
Néstor Armesto
Galician Institute of High Energy Physics (IGFAE)
Email: nestor.armesto(a)usc.es
Tel: +34 881 814 107
Web: https://igfae.usc.es/
Personal webpage: https://igfae.usc.es/nestor/
Follow us on Twitter @IGFAE_HEP
________________________________
De: Cridge, Tom <t.cridge(a)ucl.ac.uk>
Enviado: mércores, 16 de marzo de 2022 20:05
Para: ARMESTO PEREZ NESTOR <nestor.armesto(a)usc.es>
CC: dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es>
Asunto: Request for talk acceptance letter
Dear Nestor,
One of the authors of a talk we have accepted has just asked us to provide an acceptance letter for their talk clearly stating that they (Aurore Courtoy) will give a talk so that they can provide it to their institution to demonstrate their need to attend the conference (in person). Do you have anything we can provide for this or should we just write a more formal email from ourselves as conveners to this effect?
Thanks again,
Tom (for WG1 conveners)
2 years, 6 months
Re: [EXTERNAL] RE: extra joint session with WG1 ?
by ARMESTO PEREZ NESTOR
Dear all,
I am trying to find an additionalroom but, please, this does not mean that you can accept more talks, simply that we can organise things like joint sessions.
Best
Nestor
------------------------------------
Néstor Armesto
Galician Institute of High Energy Physics (IGFAE)
Email: nestor.armesto(a)usc.es
Tel: +34 881 814 107
Web: https://igfae.usc.es/
Personal webpage: https://igfae.usc.es/nestor/
Follow us on Twitter @IGFAE_HEP
________________________________
De: Cridge, Tom <t.cridge(a)ucl.ac.uk>
Enviado: mércores, 16 de marzo de 2022 19:39
Para: Yulia Furletova <yulia(a)jlab.org>; dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es>; dis2022_wg6(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg6(a)igfae.usc.es>
CC: ARMESTO PEREZ NESTOR <nestor.armesto(a)usc.es>
Asunto: Re: [EXTERNAL] RE: extra joint session with WG1 ?
Dear Yulia and WG6 conveners,
Thanks for proposing an additional session for some of the remaining future experiment talks also relevant to WG1 - we have also had issues fitting these into our schedule. Nestor if you could let us know if this is possible, we will then know how to proceed with talk acceptances/rejections/backups/posters - we are leaving these talks on hold for now.
We wanted also to mention talks 67 and 331 which are future experiment related and we were otherwise attempting to squeeze somewhere into our schedule, perhaps these would also fit into this session? I attach their abstracts, they are currently somewhat on their own amongst our abstracts. One question we do have however is about where the joint session fits in the timetable, in WG1 given we received the most abstract submissions we were told to accept 53 talks which I believe then saturates all the parallel session slots. Given this, then this joint session would presumably be in parallel with another WG1 session. Therefore we would propose that it may perhaps be better to have it purely as an extra WG6 session (I believe you have fewer talks and therefore may be able to add an additional session into the timetable more easily) in which we would pay an active interest, we would also then organise our sessions such that it does not overlap with topics likely to be of interest to similar people so attendees do not have to choose between two simultaneous sessions of interest to them. Please let us know your thoughts on this and if this extra session is possible for/with WG6.
Best,
Tom (for WG1 conveners - Tom, Barak, Klaus)
________________________________
From: Yulia Furletova <yulia(a)jlab.org>
Sent: 14 March 2022 17:08
To: ARMESTO PEREZ NESTOR <nestor.armesto(a)usc.es>; dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es>
Subject: [DIS2022_wg1] Re: [EXTERNAL] RE: extra joint session with WG1 ?
⚠ Caution: External sender
Yes, we will keep this on-hold.
On March 14, 2022 12:58:33 PM ARMESTO PEREZ NESTOR <nestor.armesto(a)usc.es> wrote:
Dear Yulia and WG1 conveners,
For another session we require an additional room or extended the planned ones. For the former I would need some days to investigate. Can you keep this on hold for some days?
Best
Nestor
------------------------------------
Néstor Armesto
Galician Institute of High Energy Physics (IGFAE)
Email: nestor.armesto(a)usc.es
Tel: +34 881 814 107
Web: https://igfae.usc.es/
Personal webpage: https://igfae.usc.es/nestor/
Follow us on Twitter @IGFAE_HEP
________________________________
De: Yulia Furletova <yulia(a)jlab.org>
Enviado: luns, 14 de marzo de 2022 12:53
Para: dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es>
CC: ARMESTO PEREZ NESTOR <nestor.armesto(a)usc.es>
Asunto: extra joint session with WG1 ?
Dear WG1 conveners, Nestor,
We have few talks which we would like to suggest for an additional joint session with WG1 :
#62, 344, 361 , 386, 399
Unfortunately we do not have space in our session.
Best, Yulia.
2 years, 6 months
Fwd: [Indico] Abstract Acceptance notification (#32)
by Wing, Matthew
Dear WG1 convenors,
Thank you for accepting this talk, ID #32. It will be given by Katarzyna Wichmann (in cc.).
Cheers,
Matthew.
Begin forwarded message:
From: <noreply-indico-team(a)cern.ch<mailto:noreply-indico-team@cern.ch>>
Subject: [Indico] Abstract Acceptance notification (#32)
Date: 10. March 2022 at 19:06:08 GMT
To: <stefan.schmitt(a)cern.ch<mailto:stefan.schmitt@cern.ch>>, <mw(a)hep.ucl.ac.uk<mailto:mw@hep.ucl.ac.uk>>
Dear Matthew Wing,
We're pleased to announce that your abstract "Impact of jet-production data on the next-to-next-to-leading-order determination of HERAPDF2.0 parton distributions" with ID #32 has been accepted in track "WG1: Structure Functions and Parton Densities" (Parallel talk).
We ask you to confirm your availability to present the talk in person in Santiago de Compostela by an email to the corresponding WG conveners. If you cannot attend yourself, please provide any co-author that is able to come to Santiago.
See below a summary of your submitted abstract:
Conference: DIS2022: XXIX International Workshop on Deep-Inelastic Scattering and Related Subjects
Submitted by: Matthew Wing
Title: Impact of jet-production data on the next-to-next-to-leading-order determination of HERAPDF2.0 parton distributions
Primary Authors: Matthew Wing, Stefan Schmitt
Co-authors:
Track classification: WG1: Structure Functions and Parton Densities
Presentation type: Parallel talk
For a more detailed summary please visit the page of your abstract:
https://indico.cern.ch/event/1072533/abstracts/137011/
Kind regards,
The organizers of DIS2022: XXIX International Workshop on Deep-Inelastic Scattering and Related Subjects
--
Indico :: Call for Abstracts
https://indico.cern.ch/event/1072533/
------------------------------------
Matthew Wing
University College London
Currently at:
DESY
Notkestrasse 85
22607 Hamburg
Germany
Tel: +49 40 8998 3281
e-mail: m.wing(a)ucl.ac.uk<mailto:m.wing@ucl.ac.uk>
2 years, 6 months
Re: DIS 2022 WG1 abstracts
by Pepe Rodriguez-Quintero
Dear conveners,
We understand very well the situation and, consequently, agree with the
merging proposed if so can help in your managing of WG1.
Therefore, I would suggest you to consider the abstract titled "Emergence
of pion and parton distributions", that I will then deliver incorporating
material from the other one, and which will be also coauthored by Khépani
Raya.
All my best,
Pp Rodríguez-Quintero.
El mar., 15 mar. 2022 19:42, Cridge, Tom <t.cridge(a)ucl.ac.uk> escribió:
> Dear colleagues,
>
> I am writing to you regarding your abstracts submitted to WG1: Structure
> Functions and Parton Densities at DIS2022 in Santiago de Compostela. As you
> may be aware, being one of the first in person conferences in a long time,
> we have received an extraordinary number of abstract submissions. As a
> result, we are writing to ask you if it might be possible to merge two of
> the abstracts submitted by yourselves and colleagues of yours. The
> abstracts we refer to are "A data-driven approach to the pion generalized
> parton distribution" (abstract number 325, to be presented by Khépani Raya
> Montaño with coauthor José Rodriguez Quintero) and "Emergence of pion and
> proton parton distributions" (abstract number 401, to be presented by José
> Rodriguez Quintero), we hope these can be merged given the shared authors
> and related topics. Please let us know if this is would be fine for you
> as the authors as soon as possible and thanks in advance for your
> understanding.
>
> Many thanks,
>
> Tom Cridge on behalf of the WG1 conveners (Tom, Barak, Klaus),
>
>
2 years, 6 months
Re: Fw: DIS2022 WG1 abstracts
by Barak Schmookler
Hi Tom,
I think what you said sounds good. We just accept a single talk for 20
minutes. If they want to split it into 2 talks (say 10+10), they can let us
know; and we can manually adjust the timetable in Indico to indicate the
details later.
-Barak
On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 12:10 PM Cridge, Tom <t.cridge(a)ucl.ac.uk> wrote:
> Hi Barak, Nestor,
>
> Should I get back to them and say we can only accept one nCTEQ talk and
> all talks are 20 mins, then how they wish to divide it amongst themselves
> is up to them and perhaps they could divide that into two back-to-back 10
> minute talks?
>
> Best,
>
> Tom
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Pit Duwentäster <p_duwe01(a)uni-muenster.de>
> *Sent:* 16 March 2022 19:07
> *To:* Cridge, Tom <t.cridge(a)ucl.ac.uk>; khoirul.muzakka(a)uni-muenster.de <
> khoirul.muzakka(a)uni-muenster.de>; karol.kovarik(a)uni-muenster.de <
> karol.kovarik(a)uni-muenster.de>; Michael Klasen <
> michael.klasen(a)uni-muenster.de>; Fred Olness <olness(a)smu.edu>
> *Cc:* dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es>
> *Subject:* Re: DIS2022 WG1 abstracts
>
>
> ⚠ Caution: External sender
>
> Dear Tom, Barak, Klaus,
>
> Thanks for your note, and we are pleased to hear of the considerable
> interest in this year's DIS workshop.
> We briefly discussed the possibility of merging the "Heavy Quark" and
> "Neutrino" talks, but concluded this would be difficult as the topics are,
> in fact, quite separate and focus on very different data sets.
> We've attached the cover pages of the current drafts (both papers will be
> on the ArXiV before the meeting) to highlight the contrasting objective of
> each.
> The heavy quark study is led by Pit Duwentaester and Michael Klasen, and
> is looking at the heavy quark meson data from RHIC and LHC. This analysis
> provides new constraints on the gluon PDF in the small-x region. The output
> of this study is a new nCTEQ15HQ PDF set.
> In contrast, the neutrino study (led by Khoirul Faiq Muzakkaand and Karol
> Kovarik) uses the results of the new nCTEQ15WZSIH PDFs, along with three
> independent compatibility criteria to definitively address the observed
> tensions between the DIS charged current and neutral current processes. The
> output of this study is a new nCTEQ15nu PDF set.
> We certainly appreciate the limited time available for your working group.
> Therefore, if it might be possible to have two separate shorter talks, that
> would be much preferable for us. We could coordinate to eliminate any
> overlapping introductory material, thus enabling the speakers to adequately
> cover the core elements.
>
> Thank you for your consideration,
> Pit Duwentäster, Khoirul Faiq Muzakka, Karol Kovarik, Michael Klasen, Fred
> Olness
>
>
> On 15.03.22 19:31, Cridge, Tom wrote:
>
> Dear colleagues,
>
> I am writing to you regarding your abstracts submitted to WG1: Structure
> Functions and Parton Densities at DIS2022 in Santiago de Compostela. As you
> may be aware, being one of the first in person conferences in a long time,
> we have received an extraordinary number of abstract submissions. As a
> result, we are writing to ask you if it might be possible to merge two of
> the abstracts submitted by yourselves on behalf of the nCTEQ collaboration
> into one talk. The abstracts we refer to are "Constraining the nuclear
> gluon PDF with heavy quark production data" (abstract number 19 submitted
> by Pit Duwentaester) and "nPDF Analysis with Neutrino DIS Data" (abstract
> number 50 submitted by Khoirul Faiq Muzakkaand and Karol Kovarik). Please
> let us know if this is would be fine for you as the authors as soon as
> possible and thanks in advance for your understanding.
>
> Many thanks,
>
> Tom Cridge on behalf of the WG1 conveners (Tom, Barak, Klaus)
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> DIS2022_wg1 mailing list -- dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es
> To unsubscribe send an email to dis2022_wg1-leave(a)igfae.usc.es
>
2 years, 6 months
Re: [DIS2022_wg1]
by yoshitaka hatta
Dear Tom and WG1 conveners,
> Thanks for your emails. As for 373 and 54 we simply meant that we would
> consider them with our others, not that we would necessarily take them - we
> need to discuss this amongst ourselves.
>
Thanks for the clarification. In the meantime we got in touch with WG4
conveners. Most likely they will not take 54.
> - We in WG1 take abstract 141 as well as 153 (we will ask the authors
> to merge it with another talk we have - 167 which is shared with yourselves
> and WG4) and 325 (again we will ask the authors to merge it with another
> talk we have). Can we take it you are not interested in these? We have
> not asked the authors to merge yet, this was our thoughts on the abstracts.
>
> WG4 showed some interest in 167. They will contact you regarding this. We
will not take the above abstracts.
>
> - You in WG5 will take/deal with shared abstracts 237, 199, 239, 72,
> 378, 391 and 394?
>
> Yes, we will take care of these.
> - For the abstracts submitted to each WG we felt more appropriate for
> the other you will take 132 and 377 as parallel talks in WG5, and 362 as a
> poster in WG5?
>
> We will take 362 as a poster. We thought of taking 132 and 377 as parallel
talks, but we may move them to posters. So if you haven't hit the accept
button yet, please hold off. We will let you know our final decision later.
>
> - Meanwhile, we will discuss 373 and 54 and let you know as soon as we
> have considered them in case you will take the latter at least as a poster.
>
> Yes, please.
Best
Yoshitaka
2 years, 6 months
Request for talk acceptance letter
by Cridge, Tom
Dear Nestor,
One of the authors of a talk we have accepted has just asked us to provide an acceptance letter for their talk clearly stating that they (Aurore Courtoy) will give a talk so that they can provide it to their institution to demonstrate their need to attend the conference (in person). Do you have anything we can provide for this or should we just write a more formal email from ourselves as conveners to this effect?
Thanks again,
Tom (for WG1 conveners)
2 years, 6 months
