Dear Maria, Then I suggest we proceed as follows: I add this abstracts to WG4. if you find that one of these abstracts is more interesting than existing ones, or if they can be used for mergings, please do. If not, just ignore them. I will indicate that you have been asked to consider them but with no guarantee. Best regards Nestor ------------------------------------ Néstor Armesto Galician Institute of High Energy Physics (IGFAE) Email: nestor.armesto(a)usc.es Tel: +34 881 814 107 Web: https://igfae.usc.es/ Personal webpage: https://igfae.usc.es/nestor/ Follow us on Twitter @IGFAE_HEP __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ De: Maria Vittoria Garzelli <garzelli(a)mail.desy.de&gt; Enviado: domingo, 6 de marzo de 2022 22:20 Para: ARMESTO PEREZ NESTOR <nestor.armesto(a)usc.es&gt; CC: dis2022_wg3(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg3(a)igfae.usc.es>; dis2022_wg4(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg4(a)igfae.usc.es&gt; Asunto: Re: [DIS2022_wg4] FW: Two late abstracts from CMS collaboration   Dear Nestor, as for as WG4 is concerned: we have already to evaluate among other abstracts submitted by CMS. However, I have to say that the latter two I see below from you are not less interesting than the ones we already have (in other words, it might also be that they are more interesting, even considering the program we have in mind and the abstracts submitted by other participants). Therefore I suggest you to keep them in standby. Let us think about them. In any case, we will not have space for all CMS abstracts and we will have to reject various ones. But these last two are not worse than the others. So, if it is for us, I would suggest you to wait, before giving any negative answer to this last-minute submission. Best regards, Maria V. On Sun, 6 Mar 2022, ARMESTO PEREZ NESTOR wrote: > Dear conveners of WG3 and WG4, > > I have been contacted by CMS for two (extremely) late abstracts. Please have a look below, I believe they > correspond to your WGs. In principle my answer would be simply not accepting them as CMS had plenty of > time, already 13 days have passed since the extended deadline for abstracts. But it may turn out that > these abstracts contain material the conference should not miss. They look to me as updates of existing > analysis but I may miss something. > > So please indicate me if you think they contain essential material for the conference and should be > considered, or not. > > Best regards > > Nestor > > ------------------------------------ > > Néstor Armesto > Galician Institute of High Energy Physics (IGFAE) > Email: nestor.armesto(a)usc.es > Tel: +34 881 814 107 > Web: https://igfae.usc.es/ > Personal webpage: https://igfae.usc.es/nestor/ > Follow us on Twitter @IGFAE_HEP > > __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ > De: Borislav Pavlov <Borislav.Pavlov(a)cern.ch&gt; > Enviado: sábado, 5 de marzo de 2022 23:12 > Para: dis2022(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022(a)igfae.usc.es&gt; > Asunto: [DIS2022] Two late abstracts from CMS collaboration   > Dear DIS organizers, > > two CMS abstracts are ready after the abstract submission deadline. > I would like to ask you to consider also this late abstracts. > The abstracts are: > > 1) Measurements of jet substructure using the CMS detector > The internal structure of jets allows us to bridge our description and understanding of short-distance > physics and color confinement. In this talk, we discuss recent measurements of jet substructure performed > using data collected by the CMS experiment at a center-of-mass energy of √s=13 TeV. Measurements of > various jet substructure observables, with and without jet grooming, are presented. The measurements are > corrected for detector effects and are compared to predictions based on state-of-the-art analytical > calculations and Monte Carlo event generators. > > 2) Latest top quark measurements with the CMS detector > The most recent results on top quark physics, obtained using data collected with the CMS experiment at > 5.02 and 13 TeV center-of-mass energies, are presented. > > Beast regards, >                           Borislav Pavlov (on behalf of the CMS conf. comm.) > >