7:35 p.m.
Dear Alessandro,
thanks for your last-minute comments. As there was no other criteria for
decision, I accepted your proposal regarding 12 and 22 and switched them.
Regarding MPI and USTC's reports on ATLAS upgrade, as obviously there
seem to exist reasonable doubts, I also kept them. Concerning 81... and
given that J. Garzón
has recently retired, he is member of the local committee, and he is the
driver of this project, I'd rather give him the chance to present his
view for the future orally.
I attach here the list of accepted contributions, that can be considered
as final. I will be distributing the agenda and communicating the
decision to participants
as soon as practically possible, not later than Wd at 23:59, as
announced earlier.
all the best
Diego
On 15/07/2024 19:41, Alessandro Paoloni wrote:
Hello, sorry for the late reply.
Just few comments about poter/talk decision.
22 seems interesting in terms of RPC slow control data
interpretation while 12 is a study of background in the muon system.
If we have to make a choice I would prefer the first one, more related
to RPC operation.
Contribution 57 is done by the ecogas collaboration, which also
submitted contribution 1; I have no idea whether the two contributions
could be merged, but in doubt I would accept it as a presentation.
Contributions 71 and 73 could go to poster, since there is one
general talk about the ATLAS RPC upgrades. However, though it is not
clear to me whether there are experimental results in contribution 71,
I'm curious to see 73 as a presentation on the production of HPL
laminates, since they quote promising results about the quality.
Contribution 74 I think that it would be better as a
presentation, since there are performances of RPCs in a cosmic ray
experiment.
81 I would accept as a poster, the presentation of the network
can be inserted in contribution 62, accepted as a talk.
Cheers,
Alessandro
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* Diego Gonzalez Diaz <diego.gonzalez.diaz(a)cern.ch>
*Sent:* Saturday, July 13, 2024 14:05
*To:* rpc2024loc(a)igfae.usc.es <rpc2024loc(a)igfae.usc.es>;
rpc2024iac(a)igfae.usc.es <rpc2024iac(a)igfae.usc.es>;
rpc2024ioc(a)igfae.usc.es <rpc2024ioc(a)igfae.usc.es>
*Subject:* [RPC2024IAC] status of accepted contributions
Dear all,
please find attached the status as of today. We will include any
additional feedback that
arrives by tomorrow, and by Monday you will get a first proposal for you
to confirm.
The current proposal is based on the combined criteria of Paulo Fonte,
Eraldo Oliveri, Roberto Guida,
Pino Iaselli and Diego González-Díaz,
all the best
Diego