Dear WG1 conveners,
We have finalised our list of abstracts and here are the results concerning
those which were also submitted to WG1:
104 -- poster
126 -- poster
149 -- we will ask to merge with 145 (submitted only to our session).
162 -- accepted (was also submitted to WG6).
174 -- rejected (was also submitted to WG4)
261 -- rejected (was also submitted to WG4)
270 -- accepted (was also submitted to WG4)
350 -- accepted
Please let us know if you have any questions or want to discuss any of
these!
Many thanks,
Guillaume, Rafal and Daria
On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 at 12:32, Cridge, Tom <t.cridge(a)ucl.ac.uk> wrote:
Dear WG2 conveners,
We have now made several of the decisions regarding our abstracts and are
just waiting on your input to finalise things as we have communicated with
the other WGs on shared talks. As a reminder the talks shared between our
WGs that we do not wish to take (some of which are also shared with other
groups) are:
104, 126, 350 (these are shared between our WGs and we do not intend to
take them, regarding 126 we already have a couple of talks from/about STAR
so we left this one)
162 (shared with WG6), we do not wish to take this as it is not too
relevant to our WG, as far as we know WG6 also are not currently taking it
174 and 270 (both shared with WG4) we do not intend to accept these and we
believe neither do WG4
149 and 261 are abstracts submitted only to our WG1 (and for 261 also to
WG4) but we do not intend to take them and thought they could be relevant
for your WG2 so have also made them available for you to view on indico, we
believe WG4 do not intend to take 261 either, please let us know your
thoughts on these.
Once we have your responses on this we can finalise our decisions on
abstracts to accept, reject, for backup, etc so we would appreciate your
swift response on this.
Many thanks again,
Tom for WG1 conveners (Tom, Barak, Klaus)
------------------------------
*From:* Cridge, Tom <t.cridge(a)ucl.ac.uk>
*Sent:* 09 March 2022 14:52
*To:* dis2022_wg2(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg2(a)igfae.usc.es>
*Cc:* dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es>
*Subject:* [DIS2022_wg1] Re: Abstracts submitted to WG2 and WG1 for DIS
2022
Dear WG2 conveners,
I am emailing to ask if you have had time to consider this yet? I am
asking as we will need to cooperate somewhat on the abstract acceptances
where they are shared and we wish to conclude this as soon as possible.
Many thanks,
Tom (for WG1 conveners)
------------------------------
*From:* Cridge, Tom <t.cridge(a)ucl.ac.uk>
*Sent:* 06 March 2022 18:03
*To:* dis2022_wg2(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg2(a)igfae.usc.es>
*Cc:* dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es>
*Subject:* [DIS2022_wg1] Abstracts submitted to WG2 and WG1 for DIS 2022
⚠ Caution: External sender
Dear WG2 conveners,
We wanted to contact you regarding shared abstracts between our two WGs.
We believe there are 6 abstracts shared between our WGs (two of which are
also shared with WG4).
In terms of these shared abstracts we felt 104, 126, 162 and 350 all would
fit better in your session than ours, with 162 and 350 specifically
considering small x whilst for 126 we already have a couple of talks from
STAR. There are also abstracts 174 and 270 shared also with WG4 which we do
not intend to take in WG1 given the tight constraints we all have.
We also had abstract 149 submitted only to our WG1, which we are currently
not intending to consider but may be of interest to your group, therefore I
attach it to this email.
Please let us know if you are taking any of these abstracts for talks and
feel free to contact us with your thoughts on this or if you have any
queries.
Many thanks,
Tom for WG1 conveners (Tom, Klaus, Barak)
------------------------------
*From:* Cridge, Tom <t.cridge(a)ucl.ac.uk>
*Sent:* 06 March 2022 18:03
*To:* dis2022_wg2(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg2(a)igfae.usc.es>
*Cc:* dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es>
*Subject:* [DIS2022_wg1] Abstracts submitted to WG2 and WG1 for DIS 2022
⚠ Caution: External sender
Dear WG2 conveners,
We wanted to contact you regarding shared abstracts between our two WGs.
We believe there are 6 abstracts shared between our WGs (two of which are
also shared with WG4).
In terms of these shared abstracts we felt 104, 126, 162 and 350 all would
fit better in your session than ours, with 162 and 350 specifically
considering small x whilst for 126 we already have a couple of talks from
STAR. There are also abstracts 174 and 270 shared also with WG4 which we do
not intend to take in WG1 given the tight constraints we all have.
We also had abstract 149 submitted only to our WG1, which we are currently
not intending to consider but may be of interest to your group, therefore I
attach it to this email.
Please let us know if you are taking any of these abstracts for talks and
feel free to contact us with your thoughts on this or if you have any
queries.
Many thanks,
Tom for WG1 conveners (Tom, Klaus, Barak)