11:08 p.m.
Dear WG4 conveners,
We have finalised our list of abstracts and here are the conclusions
regarding those which are shared with WG4 and which you are not taking:
163 -- accept
174 -- reject (also submitted to WG1 but they have also rejected it)
212 -- accept (we will ask to merge with 211, submitted only to us)
261 -- reject (also submitted to WG1 but they have also rejected it)
270 -- accept (also submitted to WG1 but they have rejected it)
313 -- poster
347 -- poster
Let us know if you have questions or would like to discuss!
Cheers,
Guillaume, Rafal, Daria (WG2)
On Thu, 10 Mar 2022 at 12:51, Maria Vittoria Garzelli <garzelli(a)mail.desy.de>
wrote:
Dear Beuf and WG2 conveners,
thank you for your email.
We are also finalizing our program. Here is our position with respect to
the abstracts in common among WG2 and WG4. At the moment, we are planning
to accept for talks the following:
#31, #366 and #369.
#31 you forgot in your email, we consider it interesting and we are going
to accept it in our group (even because we invited it).
#366 is of common interest. Considering that we explicitly invite the
author to submit to our group, we would be happy to accept it from WG4
and host for a talk in our session.
#369: we will probably try to accept it even if it is from Russian
federation.
As for the abstracts #174, #212, #270, #313 and #163: we are not planning
to accept any of them.
As a summary: we would be happy if you leave us for a talk #366, #31 and
#369. This would allow you to promote from poster to talk #347 (that we
also think is very interesting).
You can then use as a poster one of the residual ones.
Please let us know if you agree,
Maria V. on behalf of WG4.
On Thu, 10 Mar 2022, Beuf Guillaume wrote:
> Dear WG4 conveners,
>
> There are a few abstracts that have been submitted both to WG2 and WG4:
> #212, #369, #313, #163, #366 and #347.
> Out of these, we are considering to accept #366 as a talk, and #347
probably as a poster.
> On the other hand, #369 has been submitted by authors with Russian
affiliations, and it is not yet clear how we
> should proceed in such a case.
> Due to the number of abstracts that we received, it is not possible for
us to accommodate the abstracts number
> #212, #313 and #163. Can you please consider these abstracts, keeping in
mind that we will not be able to accept
> them in WG2?
> Best regards,
>
> Guillaume Beuf, for the WG2 conveners
>
>
>
>
>
> Administratorem Państwa danych osobowych jest Narodowe Centrum Badań
Jądrowych, ul. Andrzeja Sołtana 7, 05-400
> Otwock, zgodnie z przepisami RODO oraz zgodnie z obowiązującymi
przepisami prawa. Szczegółowe informacje w
> zakresie przetwarzania Państwa danych osobowych znajdują się na stronie
> internetowej
https://www.ncbj.gov.pl/klauzula-informacyjna-o-przetwarzaniu-danych-osob...
.
>
> The Administrator of your personal data is National Centre for Nuclear
Research, at Andrzeja Sołtana 7, 05-400
> Otwock, in accordance with the provisions of the GDPR and in accordance
with the applicable law. Detailed
> information on the processing of your personal data can be found on the
website
> https://www.ncbj.gov.pl/en/information-clause-personal-data-processing.
>
>
>