On Mon, 7 Mar 2022, Maria Vittoria Garzelli wrote: > Dear Tom, > > ok, we will be back to you in the week with our opinions as for all common > abstracts. (....in the meanwhile you might start to send acceptance for > the talks where WG4 is not involved and you have already clear ideas). > > As for 424: it was submitted as a poster, it is perfectly fine with us > that you accept it in that format. > > Best regards, > > Maria V. > > > On Mon, 7 Mar 2022, Cridge, Tom wrote: > >> Dear Maria, >> >> We are happy to wait for your input, indeed the email sent was intended >> to >> let you know our thoughts on >> shared abstracts so that you can respond with yours and then we can >> appropriately divide the talks. >> >> As for abstract 424, this is labelled as a poster in contribution type, >> hence our statement on accepting >> it as a poster, was that your intention? >> >> Thanks again, >> >> Tom >> >> __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ >> From: Maria Vittoria Garzelli <garzelli(a)mail.desy.de&gt; >> Sent: 06 March 2022 21:56 >> To: Cridge, Tom <t.cridge(a)ucl.ac.uk&gt; >> Cc: dis2022_wg4(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg4(a)igfae.usc.es>; >> dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es >> <dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es&gt; >> Subject: Re: [DIS2022_wg4] Abstracts submitted to WG4 and WG1 for DIS >> 2022 >>   >> ⚠ Caution: External sender >> >> >> Dear Tom and WG1 conveners, >> >> thank you very much for contacting us about the abstracts commonly >> submitted to WG1 and WG4. We have not yet taken final decisions for any >> of >> them, so, before accepting anything submitted to us and to you, we would >> be grateful if you can wait us (in other words, there might be something >> that you want to have for a talk in your session, but we might also >> want). >> From preliminary screening, we might be interested to two of the >> abstracts >> you seem also highly interested. >> >> Is it possible for you to wait some days ? >> We will have a discussion among us this tuesday. >> On wednesday or thursday it should be possible for us to confirm you if >> there is any of the abstracts you want to accept for a talk in your >> session or merge, that we also want for talks in our session. >> >> As for abstract 424 submitted for a poster to your session, fine with us >> if you accept it like that in your session. >> >> As for the WG1/WG4 abstracts you do not want to accept in your session: >> please, do not even reject them completely. We will think if accepting >> them in our session or if definitely reject them (if we also find them >> uninteresting/unsuitable). >> >> Thank you for your patience and best regards, >> >> Maria V. >> for WG4 >> >> >> >> >> On Sun, 6 Mar 2022, Cridge, Tom wrote: >> >> > Dear WG4 conveners, >> > >> > We wanted to contact you regarding shared abstracts between our two >> > WGs as it is useful to know how to >> > divide the talks across groups, particularly given the tight >> > constraints we all have. We believe there >> are >> > 17 abstracts shared between our WGs (five of which are also shared >> > with WG2, WG3 or WG5). >> > >> > In terms of these shared abstracts we wanted to accept the following: >> > 312, 167 (hoping to merge with another abstract we have), 214 (hoping >> > to merge with another abstract we >> > have), 150, 219, 138, 94, 264 and 119 >> > - we are open to you considering the talks we have here which we are >> > hoping to merge with others so >> please >> > let us know if you were intending to take those talks. >> > >> > We also intend to accept 424 which is submitted as a poster. >> > >> > Therefore we do not intend to accept: >> > 199 (also shared with WG5), 110 (we could have this one as a backup if >> > needed), 174 (also shared with >> > WG2), 226, 261, 269 or 270 (also shared with WG2) >> > >> > Please let us know if you are taking any of these abstracts for talks >> > and feel free to contact us with >> > your thoughts on this or if you have any queries. >> > >> > Many thanks, >> > Tom for WG1 conveners (Tom, Klaus, Barak) >> > >> > >> > >> >> >