Hi Tom,

They should have received an email about the merge. But I guess it is good to mention it again to them. As you saw, the EKO+yadism presenters, for example, confirmed with an updated abstract.

-Barak

On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 8:07 AM Cridge, Tom <t.cridge@ucl.ac.uk> wrote:
Dear Barak, Klaus,

I believe this talk 214 is a talk we merged with 190, I guess we should remind them this as it doesn't seem necessarily clear to them?

On this topic should we also email those authors for talks we merged where we didn't first contact them, EPPS talks are another example, to make sure they are aware their talk is merged?

Best,

Tom
From: Safura Sadeghi Barzani <Safura.SadeghiBarzani@uantwerpen.be>
Sent: 17 March 2022 13:04
To: dis2022_wg1@igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg1@igfae.usc.es>
Subject: [DIS2022_wg1] Confirming to present the talk in person
 

⚠ Caution: External sender


Dear Madam/Sir,


First of all, I would like to say thank you very very much for accepting my abstract. I really appreciate it. Then, I confirm my availability to present my talk with ID #214 in person. 


Thanks again!


Best regards,

Safura

_______________________________________________
DIS2022_wg1 mailing list -- dis2022_wg1@igfae.usc.es
To unsubscribe send an email to dis2022_wg1-leave@igfae.usc.es