Hi Tom,
We've made a preliminary pass of our agenda and plan to upload it to indico tomorrow. We currently have one session including those talks which we've currently scheduled for the third session on Tuesday (early afternoon). We weren't quite sure which sessions you didn't want us to overlap with as from a first glance most of your sessions seem to have talks about PDFs. Until we upload the agenda, we still have some flexibility to shift it around on Tuesday or Wednesday so let us know if there are particular sessions of yours that are OK to overlap with (Thursday we are planning a joint session with another group).
Cheers
Heather for WG3
Assistant Professor of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720
heather.gray@berkeley.edu
Faculty Scientist, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 50B5239, Berkeley, CA 94720
Faculty Scientist, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 50B5239, Berkeley, CA 94720
On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 7:27 AM, Tom Cridge <t.cridge@ucl.ac.uk> wrote:
Dear Adam, Heidi, Heather,
In WG1 we have now uploaded our timetable into indico, I have received some enquiries about the overlap between WG1 and WG3 in terms of the PDFs with QED/EW corrections, these talks in WG3 will be of interest to many people also wishing to see talks in WG1. Therefore I am emailing to pass on their requests as to whether it would be possible to schedule these talks and similar ones such that they overlap with non-PDF based talks in our WG1 timetable in order to minimise people wanting to attend two sessions at once. Please let us know your thoughts on this and/or if you would like to discuss this.
Many thanks,
Tom for WG1
From: Heather Gray <heather.gray@ >berkeley. edu
Sent: 10 March 2022 17:01
To: Cridge, Tom <t.cridge@ >ucl. ac. uk
Cc: dis2022_wg1@igfae. <dis2022_wg1@usc. es igfae. >; Heidi Rzehak <heidi.usc. es rzehak@ >; Adam Martin <amarti41@itp. uni-tuebingen. de nd. >edu
Subject: Re: [DIS2022_wg1] Abstracts submitted to WG3 and WG1 for DIS 2022
Caution: External sender
Hi Tom,
Thanks for the reply. We've discussed this so please see our response below.
On Sat, Feb 26, 2022 at 1:20 AM, Tom Cridge <t.cridge@ > wrote:ucl. ac. uk
Dear Adam, Heidi, and Heather,
Thank you for your email, we have also done an initial pass on the abstracts we have received and were going to get in touch with you as well. As for your specific questions:
- Abstract 24, we had intended to accept this in a session on Tools and Machine learning but are happy to discuss your inclusion instead.
→ We don't feel strongly, so happy if you accept it.
- Abstracts 93 and 351, we already have many talks from the PDF groups and so felt that these would be good to include in your WG3.
→ We're happy to accept these.
- Abstract 268 we agree with you that it is better for your WG3.
→ We've accepted it
- Abstract 406 we had labelled as backup so are happy for you to take it instead.
→ We've accepted it
- Abstract 264 we were happy to take and will contact WG3 and 4 about it.
→ We're happy that you accept this.
- Abstracts 62 and 72 are also shared between us and another working group, we believe are better for other working groups (6 and 5 respectively).
→ Yes, we are not planning on accepting these for our session.
Cheers
Adam, Heidi and Heather
We are also happy to discuss this and to divide talks in a way optimal for both groups.
Many thanks,
Tom, Klaus and Barak
From: Heather Gray <heather.gray@ >berkeley. edu
Sent: 25 February 2022 17:04
To: dis2022_wg1@igfae. <dis2022_wg1@usc. es igfae. >usc. es
Cc: Heidi Rzehak <heidi.rzehak@ >; Adam Martin <amarti41@itp. uni-tuebingen. de nd. >edu
Subject: [DIS2022_wg1] Abstracts submitted to WG3 and WG1 for DIS 2022
Dear Tom, Klaus, and Barak,
We've done an initial pass on the abstracts submitted to WG3 and wanted to get in touch with you about some abstracts that have been submitted to both WG1 and WG3.
- Abstract 24. We would like to see this accepted and we think this could fit in either, so wanted to check if you have a preference.
- Abstracts 93 and 351. We think that these would fit better in WG1 than WG3.
- Abstracts 268 and 406. We would like to accept these and think they fit better in WG3.
- Abstract 264. This was submitted to WG1, 3 and 4, but we think it would fit best in WG4 (and will get in contact with them).
Let us know your thoughts. We're happy to discuss any of these.
Best wishes,
Adam, Heidi, and Heather
Assistant Professor of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720
heather.gray@ berkeley. edu
Faculty Scientist, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 50B5239, Berkeley, CA 94720
From: Heather Gray <heather.gray@ >berkeley. edu
Sent: 25 February 2022 17:04
To: dis2022_wg1@igfae. <dis2022_wg1@usc. es igfae. >usc. es
Cc: Heidi Rzehak <heidi.rzehak@ >; Adam Martin <amarti41@itp. uni-tuebingen. de nd. >edu
Subject: [DIS2022_wg1] Abstracts submitted to WG3 and WG1 for DIS 2022
Dear Tom, Klaus, and Barak,
We've done an initial pass on the abstracts submitted to WG3 and wanted to get in touch with you about some abstracts that have been submitted to both WG1 and WG3.
- Abstract 24. We would like to see this accepted and we think this could fit in either, so wanted to check if you have a preference.
- Abstracts 93 and 351. We think that these would fit better in WG1 than WG3.
- Abstracts 268 and 406. We would like to accept these and think they fit better in WG3.
- Abstract 264. This was submitted to WG1, 3 and 4, but we think it would fit best in WG4 (and will get in contact with them).
Let us know your thoughts. We're happy to discuss any of these.
Best wishes,
Adam, Heidi, and Heather
Assistant Professor of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720
heather.gray@ berkeley. edu
Faculty Scientist, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 50B5239, Berkeley, CA 94720