Dear WG6 conveners,

I am emailing to ask if you have had time to consider these shared abstracts yet? I am asking as we will need to cooperate somewhat on the abstract acceptances where they are shared and we wish to conclude this as soon as possible.

Many thanks,

Tom (for WG1 conveners)

From: Cridge, Tom <t.cridge@ucl.ac.uk>
Sent: 06 March 2022 18:12
To: dis2022_wg6@igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg6@igfae.usc.es>
Cc: dis2022_wg1@igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg1@igfae.usc.es>
Subject: [DIS2022_wg1] Abstracts submitted to WG6 and WG1 for DIS 2022

⚠ Caution: External sender

Dear WG6 conveners,

We wanted to contact you regarding shared abstracts between our two WGs, we believe there are 9 abstracts shared between our WGs (three of which are also shared with WG2, WG3 or WG5).

In terms of these shared abstracts we do not have a session for future experiments as we hoped they would fit within your sessions, therefore as it stands we did not plan to take these shared abstracts:

62 (shared with WG3), 69, 170, 344, 361, 386, 419, 72 (shared with WG3 and WG5), 162 (shared with WG2)

Therefore please let us know if you are taking (or not) any of these abstracts and feel free to contact us with your thoughts on this or if you have any queries.

Many thanks,

Tom for WG1 conveners (Tom, Klaus, Barak)

⚠ Caution: External sender

Dear WG6 conveners,

We wanted to contact you regarding shared abstracts between our two WGs, we believe there are 9 abstracts shared between our WGs (three of which are also shared with WG2, WG3 or WG5).

62 (shared with WG3), 69, 170, 344, 361, 386, 419, 72 (shared with WG3 and WG5), 162 (shared with WG2)

Therefore please let us know if you are taking (or not) any of these abstracts and feel free to contact us with your thoughts on this or if you have any queries.

Many thanks,

Tom for WG1 conveners (Tom, Klaus, Barak)