Dear WG2 conveners, We have now made several of the decisions regarding our abstracts and are just waiting on your input to finalise things as we have communicated with the other WGs on shared talks. As a reminder the talks shared between our WGs that we do not wish to take (some of which are also shared with other groups) are: 104, 126, 350 (these are shared between our WGs and we do not intend to take them, regarding 126 we already have a couple of talks from/about STAR so we left this one) 162 (shared with WG6), we do not wish to take this as it is not too relevant to our WG, as far as we know WG6 also are not currently taking it 174 and 270 (both shared with WG4) we do not intend to accept these and we believe neither do WG4 149 and 261 are abstracts submitted only to our WG1 (and for 261 also to WG4) but we do not intend to take them and thought they could be relevant for your WG2 so have also made them available for you to view on indico, we believe WG4 do not intend to take 261 either, please let us know your thoughts on these. Once we have your responses on this we can finalise our decisions on abstracts to accept, reject, for backup, etc so we would appreciate your swift response on this. Many thanks again, Tom for WG1 conveners (Tom, Barak, Klaus) ------------------------------ *From:* Cridge, Tom <t.cridge(a)ucl.ac.uk&gt; *Sent:* 09 March 2022 14:52 *To:* dis2022_wg2(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg2(a)igfae.usc.es&gt; *Cc:* dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es&gt; *Subject:* [DIS2022_wg1] Re: Abstracts submitted to WG2 and WG1 for DIS 2022 Dear WG2 conveners, I am emailing to ask if you have had time to consider this yet? I am asking as we will need to cooperate somewhat on the abstract acceptances where they are shared and we wish to conclude this as soon as possible. Many thanks, Tom (for WG1 conveners) ------------------------------ *From:* Cridge, Tom <t.cridge(a)ucl.ac.uk&gt; *Sent:* 06 March 2022 18:03 *To:* dis2022_wg2(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg2(a)igfae.usc.es&gt; *Cc:* dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es&gt; *Subject:* [DIS2022_wg1] Abstracts submitted to WG2 and WG1 for DIS 2022 ⚠ Caution: External sender Dear WG2 conveners, We wanted to contact you regarding shared abstracts between our two WGs. We believe there are 6 abstracts shared between our WGs (two of which are also shared with WG4). In terms of these shared abstracts we felt 104, 126, 162 and 350 all would fit better in your session than ours, with 162 and 350 specifically considering small x whilst for 126 we already have a couple of talks from STAR. There are also abstracts 174 and 270 shared also with WG4 which we do not intend to take in WG1 given the tight constraints we all have. We also had abstract 149 submitted only to our WG1, which we are currently not intending to consider but may be of interest to your group, therefore I attach it to this email. Please let us know if you are taking any of these abstracts for talks and feel free to contact us with your thoughts on this or if you have any queries. Many thanks, Tom for WG1 conveners (Tom, Klaus, Barak) ------------------------------ *From:* Cridge, Tom <t.cridge(a)ucl.ac.uk&gt; *Sent:* 06 March 2022 18:03 *To:* dis2022_wg2(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg2(a)igfae.usc.es&gt; *Cc:* dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es <dis2022_wg1(a)igfae.usc.es&gt; *Subject:* [DIS2022_wg1] Abstracts submitted to WG2 and WG1 for DIS 2022 ⚠ Caution: External sender Dear WG2 conveners, We wanted to contact you regarding shared abstracts between our two WGs. We believe there are 6 abstracts shared between our WGs (two of which are also shared with WG4). In terms of these shared abstracts we felt 104, 126, 162 and 350 all would fit better in your session than ours, with 162 and 350 specifically considering small x whilst for 126 we already have a couple of talks from STAR. There are also abstracts 174 and 270 shared also with WG4 which we do not intend to take in WG1 given the tight constraints we all have. We also had abstract 149 submitted only to our WG1, which we are currently not intending to consider but may be of interest to your group, therefore I attach it to this email. Please let us know if you are taking any of these abstracts for talks and feel free to contact us with your thoughts on this or if you have any queries. Many thanks, Tom for WG1 conveners (Tom, Klaus, Barak)