1:48 p.m.
Dear Tom,
It looks like now it might create some issues with authors of 386 and 407, since both
of them already received “accept’ email from DIS2022.
And I’m sure both of them want to present their work and they will complain.
Please, give us few more days, maybe we could keep both. We need to see if we have some
extra time in our own session.
Nestor promised to send us exact “time-schedule”
Best, Yulia.
On Apr 1, 2022, at 9:25 AM, Cridge, Tom
<t.cridge@ucl.ac.uk<mailto:t.cridge@ucl.ac.uk>> wrote:
Hi Yulia,
Great, in that case I take it you are happy with that proposed session.
In the case of 386 and 407 you will have to contact Nestor to clone the abstracts so you
can merge them and accept the new one in WG6. Similarly, for talks 62, 344, 361, 386 which
will have to be converted from posters to talks. However, I have just been contacted by
the author of 62 who can no longer attend due to funding issues. Therefore I would suggest
to replace it with talk 331 (given we in WG1 have not been assigned any additional talks
we would very much appreciate this to give us an extra space). In that case the final list
would be
344, 361, 386+407 (407 from WG6 only), 67 (from WG1 only), 331 (from WG1 only) + 415 (from
WG6 only).
If you are happy with that please go ahead and organise this session (we will have our own
WG1 session to organise simultaneous with this one as Nestor mentioned).
Thanks again,
Tom
________________________________
From: Yulia Furletova <yulia@jlab.org<mailto:yulia@jlab.org>>
Sent: 01 April 2022 12:23
To: Cridge, Tom <t.cridge@ucl.ac.uk<mailto:t.cridge@ucl.ac.uk>>;
dis2022_wg1@igfae.usc.es<mailto:dis2022_wg1@igfae.usc.es>
<dis2022_wg1@igfae.usc.es<mailto:dis2022_wg1@igfae.usc.es>>
Cc: dis2022_wg6@igfae.usc.es<mailto:dis2022_wg6@igfae.usc.es>
<dis2022_wg6@igfae.usc.es<mailto:dis2022_wg6@igfae.usc.es>>
Subject: Re: [DIS2022_wg1] Re: [EXTERNAL] Additional session WG1 and WG6
Hi Cridge,
I see that 386 is already acceped by WG1, and 407 is already accepted by WG6. So, at this
stage it will be impossible to merge via indico. I talked to Anselm, he agrred on this
merge , but at this moment it is unclear who will give a talk. Maybe you could discuss
again with both of them ( with both speakers).
We will add #415 to this session.
Best, Yulia
On April 1, 2022 6:09:18 AM "Cridge, Tom"
<t.cridge@ucl.ac.uk<mailto:t.cridge@ucl.ac.uk>> wrote:
Dear WG6,
Any response to this? Sorry to rush but we are receiving questions from some of these
participants, so we wish to resolve this very quickly.
Many thanks,
Tom for WG1
________________________________
From: Cridge, Tom <t.cridge@ucl.ac.uk<mailto:t.cridge@ucl.ac.uk>>
Sent: 30 March 2022 21:27
To: Yulia Furletova <yulia@jlab.org<mailto:yulia@jlab.org>>;
dis2022_wg1@igfae.usc.es<mailto:dis2022_wg1@igfae.usc.es>
<dis2022_wg1@igfae.usc.es<mailto:dis2022_wg1@igfae.usc.es>>
Cc: dis2022_wg6@igfae.usc.es<mailto:dis2022_wg6@igfae.usc.es>
<dis2022_wg6@igfae.usc.es<mailto:dis2022_wg6@igfae.usc.es>>
Subject: Re: [DIS2022_wg1] Re: [EXTERNAL] Additional session WG1 and WG6
Dear Yulia and WG6 conveners,
Thanks for getting back to us, given a session cannot really be longer than 6 talks in
length, we would propose that we take the 4 talks we agree upon that were jointly
submitted to our WGs - i.e. 62, 344, 361, 386 (and we are fine for you to merge 407 with
this), that leaves two further talks, As we both have lots of talks to consider a fair way
to do it then seems for us each to have one talk submitted to our individual WG included
here, making up the 6 talks. Please let us know if you agree that this seems a reasonable
way to divide this.
In that case we would put talk 67 that we mentioned in here and deal with our talk 331 in
our own sessions, please let us know which of your talks (or a merger of two of your talks
into one) you would then include.
Thanks again and best regards,
Tom (for WG1 conveners - Tom, Klaus, Barak)
________________________________
From: Yulia Furletova <yulia@jlab.org<mailto:yulia@jlab.org>>
Sent: 30 March 2022 17:12
To: dis2022_wg1@igfae.usc.es<mailto:dis2022_wg1@igfae.usc.es>
<dis2022_wg1@igfae.usc.es<mailto:dis2022_wg1@igfae.usc.es>>
Cc: dis2022_wg6@igfae.usc.es<mailto:dis2022_wg6@igfae.usc.es>
<dis2022_wg6@igfae.usc.es<mailto:dis2022_wg6@igfae.usc.es>>
Subject: [DIS2022_wg1] Re: [EXTERNAL] Additional session WG1 and WG6
⚠ Caution: External sender
Hi Klaus, all,
We are proposing to keep 407 ( and merge 386 into 407) - we do not have space for both
!
62, 344, 361 are fine to us. We propose to add here 407 ( merged with 386)
It would be good if we could squeeze there couple of more talks from WG6- at the moment we
are at the overflow.
for example ,
415 - CORE - a Compact Detector for the Electron-Ion Collider
0r 298 - ATHENA – A new detector proposed at the Electron-Ion Collider
84 - The impact of energy frontier DIS measurements on future hadron collider physics
(HL-LHC and FCC-hh)
Your thoughts ?
Best, Yulia
It
On Mar 30, 2022, at 9:33 AM, Klaus Rabbertz
<klaus.rabbertz@cern.ch<mailto:klaus.rabbertz@cern.ch>> wrote:
Dear WG6 conveners,
have you come to a conclusion concerning our proposal?
I fear we have to conclude on this rather quickly now.
Thank you and best regards,
Klaus (for WG1 conveners - Tom, Klaus, Barak)
Cridge, Tom wrote:
Dear WG6 conveners,
Following Nestor's hard work to obtain an additional room and confirmation we can
accept a few additional talks for joint sessions earlier today, we are emailing to return
to your idea of a joint session between WG1 and WG6 on future experiments. We would
propose to include the following talks in this session (some of which we currently only
had room for as posters):
62, 344, 361, 386 and also 331("Studying nuclear matter with jets in the sPHENIX
experiment at RHIC") and 67 ("Probing free nucleons with (anti)neutrinos")
, the first four were all jointly submitted to our WGs originally whilst the latter two
were submitted to WG1 on this topic, therefore I include the titles for those two.
Please let us know if this would work for you and if so/not your comments on this. I would
also note that currently in WG1 we are occupying one room for the whole of the timetabled
parallel sessions, therefore this additional joint session would be parallel to one of our
sessions and in addition to WG6's current sessions I believe. We would organise our
timetable to ensure the overlapping topics were not of mutual interest.
Many thanks,
Tom (for WG1 conveners - Tom, Klaus, Barak)
_______________________________________________
DIS2022_wg1 mailing list --
dis2022_wg1@igfae.usc.es<mailto:dis2022_wg1@igfae.usc.es>
To unsubscribe send an email to
dis2022_wg1-leave@igfae.usc.es<mailto:dis2022_wg1-leave@igfae.usc.es>